The Pornography Debate, Part Three: What is Obscenity?

With John Stagliano facing obscenity charges for two movies he distributes as well as an online movie trailer I find myself, as well as others, asking more and more often, what constitutes obscene. Everyone has their own opinion. What bothers one person doesn't bother someone else.

It's interesting that when a big name pornographer like John Stagliano (in the past it has been Larry Flint) is pulled into the media spotlight over something the government decided is obscene, groups like Morality in Media come out of the woodwork. Currently they are
 complaining that while they are happy Stagliano and his company Evil Angel Productions are being targeted, they are upset that others aren't being targeted. This is a group that recently went after Wal-Mart for displaying the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition where children could see it, calling it soft-core pornography. If it were up to conservative groups like Morality in Media everything we viewed would conform to the standards of the Christian Coalition. The problem is, not everyone holds those beliefs.

There are just as many people out there that want proper sex education promoting condom use, safe sex and education on sexually transmitted diseases as there are people wanting abstinence only education. Currently any organization promoting and educating about safe sex and sexually transmitted diseases and not abstinence only loose federal tax dollars. Unfortunately there really is no middle ground on this topic, its one extreme or the other.

The same goes for entertainment. There are just as many that want only family friendly entertainment to be the norm as there are those that want more adult oriented entertainment. Personally, I get tired of watching family friendly shows and movies. Yes, I enjoyed watching the family movies The Game Plan and Meet the Robinsons. However, I also enjoy movies like The Marine and Van Wilder. I don't read Sports Illustrated, but I do read Savage that often features tattoos and piercings in sensitive areas. Given free reign groups like Morality in Media would have all these things outlawed as being "obscene" and "immoral".

 
Comments 1 - 2 of 2  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

I am my children's censor. If they have an issue with something, they ask me about it. Tater saw a woman on tv, when he got up to get a drink, and asked why she wasn't wearing enough clothes. I told him that she got too warm if she wore sweaters. Sexual imagery is much easier to explain than violent imagery. My son saw a commercial depicting a dead body a while back, and it was aired prior to prime time. It bothered him more than seeing women who didn't wear clothes like his Mommy wears. I dont' believe that inappropriate introduction of sexuality benefits kids. I also don't believe that seeing semi-naked bodies on the magazine rack while Mommy gathers her coupons is going to scar kids for life. People in swimsuits are just that: people in swimsuits. Kids realize that. Seeing violent images that cannot be explained, yes. That is bad. Those should not just be tossed about on commercial breaks. My kids giggle when they see me naked. Perhaps it is the lack of a penis,

Posted on 04/26/2008 at 8:04:36 PM

I, for one, do not want my child seeing mostly naked people as we shop for groceries. I'm not christian, generally not conservative, but I think some images are best seen only by adults. When I am walking down the aisle looking for toilet paper, my daughter is looking at anything within her line of sight- including the magazine rack. When she points at the cover of a fitness magazine and asks "why is that lady naked" I am upset. The lady wasn't completely naked, but close enough. Groups should go after grocery stores that display magazines where children can see them that display nude or near nude people. I don't believe porn or near-porn should be censored- adults should be able to look at the magazines and images they want to see. Just let me keep it away from my kid!

Posted on 04/20/2008 at 9:04:13 PM

Comments 1 - 2 of 2