Find » Opinion/Editorial » Iran and Al-Sadr: Destabilizing the...

Iran and Al-Sadr: Destabilizing the Middle East

By Greg Reeson, published Oct 13, 2006
Published Content: 283  Total Views: 70,583  Favorited By: 19 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.6 of 5
The online publication Middle East Newsline reported October 13th that the Iranian government had transferred millions of dollars, weapons and military expertise to the Mahdi Army controlled by radical Iraqi Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr. This report in and of itself is not really newsworthy because it has long been known that the Iranians were close to al-Sadr and were providing him with materiel support since the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003. 

What is newsworthy is that the level of support to al-Sadr's militia continues to increase with each passing month as Iran attempts to position itself as the strongest political, economic, and military power in the Middle East. 

Al-Sadr, whose religious and military headquarters is located in the southern Iraqi city of An Najaf, has been a thorn in the side of the United States since the beginning of Operation Iraqi Freedom. His militia has confronted both the Americans and the British in bloody battles and his political party has consistently obstructed the Iraqi government. 

The religious leaders controlling the government in Iran see their fellow Shiite, al-Sadr, as a vehicle for fomenting unrest in Iraq by using him to exert Iranian influence in the war-torn country. The Iranians can funnel weapons, money, and military expertise to al-Sadr, who is making a political play for power himself, while denying to the world that they are actively interfering in the internal affairs of their neighbor. 

The Iranians are using al-Sadr much as they used Hezbollah in the recent Israeli - Lebanese conflict. By waging proxy wars the Iranians are able to increase their clout within the Shiite community without causing difficulties for the government in Tehran. 

The ultimate goal is to establish a Shiite hegemony in a region largely ruled by Sunni governments. This Iranian posturing worries other nations in the region, particularly Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, and Syria, who feel threatened by the rising power of Shiite factions. 

Comments
Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
 
S.L. - your arguments would be more compelling if you actually talked about things people said, not just made things up. I never said the US was the cause of the terrorists. We did, however, turn them from a fringe group into a "cause celebre" in the Muslim world, an analysis based on current government reports. I don't drink kool-aid, I prefer beer. I'm not far-left, I'm very much of a centrist. Do you have anything other than slogans and knee-jerk reactions?

Posted on 10/25/2006 at 12:10:00 PM

 
Man, we sure underestimated the # of forces needed in Iraq. Greg, without political partisanship, do you think it would have been smarter for us to go after Iran instead of Saddam 5 years ago? It seemed the Iranians had more negative influence on other extremists in the area than Saddam ever did b/c he was such a megalomaniac.

Posted on 10/19/2006 at 11:10:00 PM

 
Fine analysis, Greg. Your only mistake is calling that fractious group in Iraq a government. It is pretty obvious (70 Americans KIA this month already) that we are in the middle of a civil war and unless we are ready to commit a lot more troops very soon we had better get used to al-Sadr and that Shiite hegemony you're talking about.

Posted on 10/19/2006 at 11:10:00 AM

 
Sierra India Mike Papa Echo Romeo fracking Foxtrot India

Posted on 10/17/2006 at 10:10:00 PM

 
I find your analysis pretty spot on, but I believe it was the unfortunate actions of our own government that caused this. While Saddam was a murderous bastard, he kept a certain balance in check in the middle east. On September 12, 2001, Al Qaeda and their cause were held in contempt throughout most of the world. Because of this country's failure of leadership, they are now a more serious threat, with more support throughout the world. If we'd only stayed and fixed Afganistan, the Muslim world might have shifted more towards sympathy for the West and moderation.

Posted on 10/16/2006 at 3:10:00 PM

 
This has been the main undercurrent in the Middle East for awhile now. Thank you for pointing out the facts for a change. If anyone should question who we are fighting anymore -- we're fighting Iran. IT may be a proxy war, but that's the reality of the war now.

Posted on 10/16/2006 at 2:10:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
Advertisment