Obama and Hillary's Battle for Presidency Hurts Both Candidates in the End

By Mark Stuart ELLISON, published May 16, 2008
Published Content: 53  Total Views: 38,638  Favorited By: 7 CPs
Rating: 4.0 of 5
The riveting, brutal brawl between Democratic presidential hopefuls Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton will probably result in the nomination of the loser of the general election. Both Obama and Hillary are so seriously flawed that only a catastrophic event can propel them to victory against John McCain.

Mrs. Clinton's conduct during this campaign has been incredibly mean-spirited. While Mr. Obama has sought to keep race out of this contest, Mrs. Clinton has employed surrogates to stoke racial animus. We have heard New York State attorney general Andrew Cuomo refer to Obama's "shuck and jive;" Bill Shaheen, husband of former New Hampshire governor Jeanne Shaheen, imply that Mr. Obama is a drug dealer; former congresswoman Geraldine Ferraro say that the only reason Mr. Obama has been a successful presidential candidate is because he's black; and Bill Clinton audaciously remark that Obama was "playing the race card" against him. Mrs. Clinton has followed each of these attacks and others with either an apology and/or firing of the speaker.

It's a nasty but clever strategy similar to an old trial lawyer trick. The attorney makes a prejudicial statement about a witness in court and then "withdraws" it. The remark can be striken from the record, but not from the jurors' minds.

I'm a political independent who has been rooting for Obama in the primaries because, as former Clinton White House adviser Dick Morris has repeatedly warned, "Hillary Clinton is a uniquely pernicious person." I was captivated by Obama's Kennedyesque speaking ability and his sunny, inspirational style promising a post-racial, post-partisan politics. But the revelations of the past few months have left me deeply disappointed.

Obama and Hillary's Battle for Presidency Hurts Both Candidates in the End
Obama and Hillary's Battle for Presidency Hurts Both Candidates in the End

Hillary talks tough but is a weak candidate.

Credit: Marc Nozell

Copyright: Wikimedia Commons

Takeaways
  • Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton would both be weak candidates in a general election.
  • Unless Iraq deteriorates or the economy goes south, John McCain will be the next president.
  • Although a weaker candidate, Obama has much stronger moral fiber than does Hillary.
Did You Know?
Hillary Clinton was fired from her position as a House Judiciary Committee lawyer in 1974 for writing an unethical legal memorandum arguing that President Richard Nixon should be denied counsel during his impeachment trial.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
 
Would be nice if people would stop blaming Senator Obama for the Clintons crimes and lies.

Posted on 05/17/2008 at 3:05:48 PM

 
(continued from previous comment) Legal precedent is the law, and I'm not twisting it. In addition to private lawyers, Bill Clinton used government attorneys like White House counsel Charles Ruff to assist in his impeachment defense. Wise up, sir.

Posted on 05/16/2008 at 2:05:53 PM

 
Interesting idea about an independent run, but with her $20 million in campaign debt and counting, that would be a tall order for Hillary. It's hard to see how she could run as an independent after being a fixture in Democratic politics for decades, but stranger things have occurred in this race. In doing so, she would further damage the Democratic Party. Regarding counsel for Nixon, Hillary was absolutely unethical. In writing her memo, she deliberately ignored a legal precedent that her boss--an attorney, not a politician--explicitly told her to consider. As an attorney, I know this is Ethics 101, and Hillary flunked miserably. Not out of ignorance--she's very smart--but out of choice. U.S. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, who was impeached about once every ten years when he was on the bench, was deemed by our court system to have a right to counsel. If he has a right to counsel during an impeachment proceeding, it's a no-brainer that an American president would. Legal prece

Posted on 05/16/2008 at 2:05:23 PM

 
If she fails to get nomination she should file her candidacy as an independent. Nixon cannot expect a counsel at taxpayer's expense as a matter of right. She didn't do any unethical thing based on the law. May be according to politicians. Don't twist the law of the land, just because most of the readers may be born after Nixon's presidency.

Posted on 05/16/2008 at 12:05:37 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
Most Commented On