Find » Opinion/Editorial » Barak Obama for President? Not Yet

Barak Obama for President? Not Yet

By Max Power, published Oct 27, 2006
Published Content: 80  Total Views: 93,709  Favorited By: 9 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 2.5 of 5
Recently, AC Content Producer Telika Howard did a review of a Time Magazine piece on Illinois Senator Barack Obama and his possible 2008 Presidential run called "Time Magazine Declares: Barack Obama May Be Next President." She highlights the article's focus on Obama's fervent religious beliefs and his desire to seek compromises with Republicans on key national issues.

While I find these things highly virtuous and admirable traits, Barack Obama is not a good Presidential candidate. I say this as a lifelong resident of Illinois and a center-left individual who loathes the current administration in power. As hard as it is for me to reject all of the good that Obama brings to the table (and he has a wealth of good and potential), I feel he is simply the wrong candidate for the Presidency in 2008. Care to know why?

Inexperience.
This is the issue everyone knows. At 45, the man has less than a decade of experience in public service. As of right now, he has eight years of experience in the Illinois State Senate and two years of experience in the United States Senate. He has never held executive office in any capacity. In the Senate, he has ranked near the bottom in terms of operative seniority and only served on one of the essential committees (Foreign Relations).

Barak Obama for President? Not Yet

Barack Obama.

Credit: U.S. Congress

Copyright: Public Domain

Takeaways
  • Senators make poor candidates.
  • The Democrats need someone from a swing or red state.
  • Obama's time will come, just not yet.
Did You Know?
If Hilary Clinton chooses to run, her political machine will probably bury Obama (assuming he runs also). Remember the media smear job that halted the Howard Dean campaign (well, that and mismanagement). According to insiders, the Clintons were responsible...
Resources
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 9 of 9
 
 
Probably, but maybe just winning isn't good enough anymore - at some point we need to start spreading a message that can turn around all the myths and lies perpetuated by the right over the past 35 years or so.

Posted on 10/31/2006 at 1:10:00 PM

 
...and Moyers understands (and dislikes) right-wing power in all its forms (media, religious/apocalyptic, class, and corporate). He probably would be the genuinely brightest person we'd have running for President since Stevenson, which means he doesn't have a shot in hell to win.

Posted on 10/30/2006 at 9:10:00 AM

 
Bill Moyers would be an amazing candidate - apparently he is considering a run. A Moyers candidacy could mean a renaissance for the Democratic party, which has in many ways betrayed its working class base. Moyers is seriously one of the most inspiring speakers I have ever heard and literally gives me chills. He is a Texan, baptist, which will open up areas in which the democratic party has had little success. I would love to see him run for real.

Posted on 10/30/2006 at 7:10:00 AM

 
you could be right, christina. that's the power of the vote: you can give someone a job or not.

Posted on 10/28/2006 at 4:10:00 PM

 
It's ironic. In the job market you need at least one degree, continuing education credits and certifications, experience, accomplishments, and it doesn't hurt if you develop, run, and sell a successful small business. Is it me, or is it harder to get a job than it is to run for president? Does it ever occur to some politicans that they're simply not qualified?

Posted on 10/27/2006 at 6:10:00 PM

 
if it's Hilary/Condi in 2008 I'm going to vomit and pray that there's a sensible 3rd option. That's not an anti-woman statement, that's an anti-Hilary and anti-Condi statement. The ONLY thing Hilary has going for her is her gender, and Condi is just..we...pro-Bush.

Posted on 10/27/2006 at 1:10:00 PM

 
Vilsack won't work because the word "sack" is in his name - I'm not even joking. In all seriousness, I agree with most of what your saying here J.C., but honestly, if Hillary is the nominee I will vomit.

Posted on 10/27/2006 at 1:10:00 PM

 
Imagine that, J.C. I'm a conservative and something to contribute to your article. Is hell freezing over? Seriously, I like Krauthammer's writing a lot. He's worth reading, even for liberals.

Posted on 10/27/2006 at 12:10:00 PM

 
Thanks for the link, Greg. He's right on the money with his "foreign policy novice" point. I have to think that would be a main attack point for the GOP. My only problem with him running a full-blown campaign is that I'm affraid the Clinton elites will smear him the same way they did Howard Dean, and I'm affraid a failure might kill his political career (Kennedy never had to face the modern smear machine) like it has so many others. That was a good - and on the whole, right - article that I wish more Dems. would read and understand. Thanks.

Posted on 10/27/2006 at 11:10:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 9 of 9
 
Most Commented On