Find » Politics » High Oil Prices Caused by Falling D...

High Oil Prices Caused by Falling Dollar? Not so Fast!

By Robert Fanney, published May 08, 2008
Published Content: 56  Total Views: 12,169  Favorited By: 10 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.5 of 5
In the past few months, economists and pundits have blamed raging oil prices on a falling value of the dollar relative to foreign currencies. From a period of December through March, the dollar fell against the euro and other major currencies as aftershocks of the housing and credit crisis rippled through the US economy. But today, oil touched $124 dollars a barrel in the face of a rising dollar.

According to Nate Hudgins at The Oil Drum, in the period of time when oil has risen from $106 per barrel to its current high price, the dollar has rallied from 1.6 to 1.535 dollars per euro. Looking at the price data in this way lends new clarity for the reasons behind the high price of oil. Such reasons have been well defined by Peak Oil theorists like Colin Campbell and Kenneth Deffeyes for more than a decade now. But despite Campbell and Deffeyes sounding the alarm far ahead of the crisis we are in today, it takes the removal of all other possibilities for energy optimists like CERA's Daniel Yergin to predict $150 oil.

The fact that Yergin is predicting a rise in oil prices should be cause for certain alarm among those who follow oil markets. Yergin has consistently predicted lower prices, year-on-year, despite a world-wide failure to discover substantial new oil reserves in the face of a vicious depletion rate. For people like Yergin to change their tune at this point heralds the beginning of a new era for world energy production. That era is the age of Peak Oil which, whether we admit it or not, we have entered already.

Resources
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 7 of 7
 
 
I hope you're right about US energy markets. I don't see coal, natural gas, or oil pulling us out. On the other hand, I have zero aversion to US nuclear power and heavily support alternatives like wind and solar. In a state of normalcy, I would absolutely agree with you on subsidies. That said, in my opinion, we've entered a period of extended crisis. I think investment in wind, solar, nuclear as well as R&D in electric vehicles, new battery technology, and plug in systems that help support our infrastructure and add load sharing capacity is a necessity at the moment. Long term, the subsidy per watt will go down as market forces reduce costs and add efficiency. But you need a kick in the pants to start the process. On the BTU basis, gas is more expensive than solar energy at the moment. So being rigged to a less efficient, more costly, energy source is, in my opinion, economic suicide. For my part, I don't think either you or I are all wrong or all right on the issue. In my opinion, yo

Posted on 05/14/2008 at 3:05:10 PM

 
Well, true is true, Fanney. And I think everyone recognizes the need for U.S. energy independence. I appreciate what you say about "panic" reactions. I believe that U.S. energy markets can "turn" before "peak oil" is reached but eliminating the use of fossil fuels for electricity production is vital. And we need to do it without causing further economic weakness in the economy. While I support wind and solar, they are by no means the "answer". EIA figures state wind & solar produces less than 1% of total electricity, even after huge subsidies for many, many years. Tax subsidized Megawatt hour costs (EIA) for solar: $24.34. Wind:$23.37. By contrast, coal and gas susbsidies are .44 and .67 cents respectively. Noone wants to face the news that electricity from nuclear ($1.59 subsidy) is the best way of turning away from Middle Eastern oil. Subsidies can bankrupt the economy just as much as "peak oil" can. Hey, I enjoyed arguing with you, in spite of losing.

Posted on 05/13/2008 at 6:05:37 AM

 
Dear God! Economists agree with me? Then hell must really be freezing over! In any case, I have to give you Kudos for rationally supporting your arguments and graciously conceding points. You're a good man and I respect you for it. There is one other point I'd like to raise -- our oil addiction puts downward pressure on the dollar by exaggerating the trade gap and running us into deficit. It's not the root cause for the falling dollar but it is a contributing factor. In my opinion, Peak Oil is happening now. I don't think we need to panic, but we do need to respond while we have the opportunity. There may be plenty of oil in the ground. But it's the oil that's very difficult to extract that makes up the largest amounts.

Posted on 05/09/2008 at 9:05:02 PM

 
You win, Fanney.... I just read a story in the Wall Street Journal which conducted a survey of economists on the subject we're talking about. It said that 51% of economists agreed with you that the "fundamentals" (supply and demand) were the most significant factors for oil prices. Only 11% agreed with me that commodities speculation had a great impact on oil prices. :)

Posted on 05/09/2008 at 6:05:04 AM

 
You make a strong argument that other factors come into play besides the weak dollar. Supply and demand, currency weakness, geopolitical unrest, oil cartels, infrastructure capabilities (exploring for, investing in machinery, management, etc, no need to ramble on.. you know the drift) and I agree. It is true that, in that thing I wrote originally, that I placed emphasis on currency and I did that merely to show how currency affects prices of everything. I didn't want to get too complicated by mentioning also that ALL of these factors have led to a giant increase in commodities speculation (not just oil) as people buy up the oil produced today for their uses six or twelve or 18 months from now. If the people who control monetary policy could do something ( to curtail the panic cycle of "peak oil", then oil prices will stabilize or drop, though never to 20 bbl. On the other hand, when demand peaks (due to inflated prices), that will also put downward pressure on oil. I think th

Posted on 05/09/2008 at 5:05:11 AM

 
Fair enough. That said, in all major currencies, oil has seen a massive increase in price since 2000. Based on Dollar/euro value comparisons alone, the price of oil would be about $20 per barrel with no other outside factors weighing in. Oil, in eruos, right now is about 80 per barrel -- twice the cost of 2005 oil in euros. So even in an euro to oil comparison, there are clearly other factors. As for OPEC limiting supply -- that's not entirely true. Every OPEC country is pumping oil flat out. The only country in OPEC and probably the world with any spare capacity is Saudi Arabia. Unfortunately, Saudi spare capacity has recently come into question.With Ghawar, their largest oil field, in likely decline, the likelyhood that Saudi can increase substantially is looking increasingly slim. So it's likely that OPEC isn't holding back on much, if any, oil. Furthermore, we wouldn't be in this situation without a severe crisis in non-OPEC oil.

Posted on 05/08/2008 at 2:05:33 PM

 
Iinteresting article. As you may know, economics is an area where a person is always both right and wrong, generally at the same time. :) You noted rising oil prices at a time when the dollar was edging up very slightly over a very short-term period, a matter of weeks You make a dollar-euro comparison in a range of 1.5 - 1.6. But when economists attribute slumping dollar values as a reason for the high cost of energy (and other imports), they are referring to a longer term period. The euro-dollar rates started out with something like $.86 cents per Euro and that wasn't so long ago. Since then, the euro doubled in value while the dollar halved in value. That alone would double the price of imported oil. Supply and demand puts upward pressure on price, too; OPEC limits supply to drive prices higher and Americans respond by shooting themselves in the foot.

Posted on 05/08/2008 at 5:05:38 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 7 of 7
 
Most Commented On