Find » Opinion/Editorial » West Virginia Primary Polls: Pointi...

West Virginia Primary Polls: Pointing Toward an Obama-Clinton Ticket?

Big Win in West Virginia Primary Clinton's Way into the White House?

By saul relative, published May 12, 2008
Published Content: 562  Total Views: 751,904  Favorited By: 66 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.3 of 5
West Virginia is a solid Democratic voting state. It's state officials and state representatives are primarily Democrats. But it voted for George W. Bush in both 2000 and 2004. Why? Coal. Coal is the lifeblood of the economy of West Virginia and, where coal goes, West Virginia goes. The Bush camp promised to help the failing coal industry in 2000 and even though the United Mine Workers of America endorsed Al Gore for president, the state went to Bush. Analysts are still arguing over the possible reasons why West Virginia stayed in the Bush corner in 2004. But both victories boil down to god, gays, and guns. West Virginia is socially conservative, religious, and 70% of the households own a gun.

With the current state of affairs in the Democratic Party, Republicans are hoping to be able to do it one more time. And if Senator Barack Obama receives the Democratic Party nomination for president, Democrats are afraid that they just might. Selling Obama will be difficult. He is liberal, pro-abortion, and pro civil union.

The reason for the worry this time around is exacerbated by the large point differential in poll numbers between the two Democratic contenders. Two American Research Group polls, one at the beginning of April and the other last week, has Senator Hillary Clinton increasing an original 15-point lead (37% - 22%) to a shocking 43 points (66% - 23%). These two polls suggest that most of the undecided voters have decided to vote for Senator Clinton.

Numbers like these are bolstering the idea that Clinton may be Obama's best choice for vice president.

But two Rasmussen polls, one taken the second week of March and the other the first week of May, tells a much different story. Although it still looks bad for Obama, the numbers are stable. The first poll had Senator Clinton ahead by 28 points (55% - 27%). The second showed Senator Clinton increasing her lead by 1 percentage point (56% -27%). Of course, with the undecided vote, those numbers could equal the poll numbers of American Research Group.

West Virginia Primary Polls: Pointing Toward an Obama-Clinton Ticket?
Comments
Comments 1 - 15 of 15
 
 
Ever notice, Reliable, that politicians put their own best interests ahead of what is economically beneficial to the country?

Posted on 05/18/2008 at 11:05:18 PM

 
Hillary Clinton has caused so much rancor in the party ranks that if she isn't the nominee, at least 25% of her followers say they'll defect to the Republicans in November. In this aspect, she places a premium on her chances of getting onto the Democratic ticket. But Edwards nullifies that. Edwards is the more likeable of the two.

Posted on 05/18/2008 at 11:05:59 PM

 
arrghh! politics! just get some education on basic Economics already!

Posted on 05/17/2008 at 4:05:45 PM

 
Great observation, excellent comments! Jacksmith, I am incline to agree with you. It is indeed about electability! Hillary is no new comer to old party politics, and she has by far ran one of the most exciting presidential race since JFK. Look out, Hillary hasn't stayed in this race for popularity, she's got an ace in the hole, and she's holding all the trump cards. Albeit, John Edwards has thrown his hat into the center ring to what he believes will be a resounding win in the Obama's camp. IT AIN'T OVER, until the lady in the pants say it's over.

Posted on 05/17/2008 at 11:05:45 AM

 
We'll just have to wait and see, Kathera. Politics is a strange business. And Clinton is building leverage...

Posted on 05/14/2008 at 12:05:25 AM

 
And it's beginning to look as if that is what she wants and what she's going to get, Bat...

Posted on 05/14/2008 at 12:05:10 AM

 
Could be, jacksmith. But maybe not. It's hard to tell, politics being what it is...

Posted on 05/14/2008 at 12:05:31 AM

 
Interesting note, Lawrence A. Not a good idea for Obama, if this is headed where I think it is...

Posted on 05/14/2008 at 12:05:44 AM

 
wow, this topic really sparks controversy! I'm all for a combined ticket. I'm starting to lose faith in either alone, especially since this country refuses to right the wrongs of the last 8 years. I think together they will keep each other balanced. However an insider advance person tells me that theres no way it will happen. I hope they're wrong.

Posted on 05/13/2008 at 1:05:36 PM

 
Seriously, Clinton and Obama together on the ticket would be the best way to salve all wounds. They don't have to be best buddies, they just have to keep the party united!

Posted on 05/13/2008 at 12:05:23 AM

 
IT'S ABOUT ELECTABILITY !!! MY FELLOW "BITTER", STUPID, WORKING CLASS PEOPLE :-) If you think like Barack Obama, that WORKING CLASS PEOPLE are just a bunch of "BITTER"!, STUPID, PEASANTS, Cash COWS!, and CANNON FODDER. :-( You Might Be An Idiot! :-) If you think Barack Obama with little or no experience would be better than Hillary Clinton with 35 years experience. You Might Be An Idiot! :-) If you think that Obama with no experience can fix an economy on the verge of collapse better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) led the greatest economic expansion, and prosperity in American history. You Might Be An Idiot! :-) If you think that Obama with no experience fighting for universal health care can get it for you better than Hillary Clinton. Who anticipated this current health care crisis back in 1993, and fought a pitched battle against overwhelming odds to get universal health care for all the American people. You Might Be An Idiot! :-)

Posted on 05/12/2008 at 5:05:43 PM

 
HILLARY CLINTON CAN BEST WIN IN NOVEMBER: IT'S ABOUT ELECTABILITY !!! It's time for everyone to face the truth. Barack Obama has no real chance of winning the national election in November at this time. His crushing defeat in Pennsylvania, and loss in Indiana makes that fact crystal clear. His best, and only real chance of winning in November is on a ticket with Hillary Clinton as her VP. Sen. Obama has zero chance of winning against the republican attack machine, and their unlimited money, and resources without Hillary Clinton. Zero chance. It is absolutely essential that the democrats take back the Whitehouse in November. America, and the American people are in a very desperate condition now. And the whole World has been doing all that they can to help keep us propped up. Hillary Clinton say's that the heat, and decisions in the Whitehouse are much tougher than the ones on the campaign trail. But I think Sen. Obama faces a test of whether he has what it takes to be

Posted on 05/12/2008 at 5:05:22 PM

 
According to AP, Obama camp has scheduled a meeting with Christie Todd Whitman, former Gov. NJ, frmr EPA sec. Additionally, the website obamawhitman2008.com was purchased just yesterday... might be an interesting wrinkle...

Posted on 05/12/2008 at 10:05:41 AM

 
Thanks, 3lilangels. Just want to give people a little more than the usual slant. The CNN report I read just gave the lopsided ARG poll but not the Rasmussen. Although it may turn out to be the same (because of the undecided) in the end, I did not think that was an accurate account. Also, these guys tend to get myopic when it comes to the elections. I really believe that Obama's choices are narrowing daily as to who he can truly pick as a running mate. And that bloc of white blue-collar voters is troublesome. He's going to have to choose either Clinton or Edwards to pull the party back into alignment so they can have a chance at winning in November. Otherwise...

Posted on 05/12/2008 at 10:05:53 AM

 
Great reporting on this, very detailed!!!!!!

Posted on 05/12/2008 at 9:05:56 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 15 of 15
 
Advertisment