Obama, Clinton, McCain: Who is Greener?

Experience Aside, the Candidates' Environment Platforms

Since Al Gore made it popular for politicians to endorse and promote environmental issues, they're all doing it. In fact, environmentalism hasn't been been such a hot topic since Theodore Roosevelt set up the National Parks system. In the interest
Obama, Clinton, McCain: Who is Greener?
 of full-fledged pandering (John McCain even has a webstore with caps, buttons, and t-shirts promoting his "green" agenda) , all three of the current presidential candidates have eco-friendly platforms. And to be fair, it is difficult to ascertain how sincere each candidate is about the environment and "green" issues. But a comparison should at least shed light on who might have the best ideas.

Senator John McCain is a self-proclaimed leader in the fight against global warming. According to his candidacy website and invoking Theodore Roosevelt, McCain's boldly states that the environment and economic interests are not mutually exclusive. He maintains a commitment to clean air and water and calls for stricter emissions laws. He has stated in the past that he wants to see the Environmental Protection Agency made into a presidential Cabinet position. He believes in the continued protection of our National Parks system.

Senator Hillary Clinton supports "green-collar" training and wanted to add $5 billion to her economic stimulus plan just for green-collar jobs (jobs that are specifically geared toward the environment and/or conservation). Clinton wants to limit greenhouse emissions by 80% by 2050. She emphasizes programs that provide incentives to increase in fuel efficiency standards on all vehicles to 55 miles per gallon by 2030 and to provide $20 billion of "Green Vehicle Bonds" for U.S. automakers to help retool their plants to meet those standards. Clinton has also suggested that a new "Connie Mae" program to be set up to provide loans to retrofit old or build new homes that are more green and energy efficient. She has even suggested legislation to require federal buildings built after January 20, 2009, every federal building be built that registers zero emissions.

 
Comments 1 - 7 of 7  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

My pleasure, Jill...

Posted on 05/15/2008 at 4:05:24 PM

Thanks, 3lilangels...

Posted on 05/15/2008 at 4:05:59 PM

One thing you have to realize about McCain, though, is his commitment to corporate interests, which is one of the reasons why the League of Conservation Voters gave him a 52% rating. So, basically, with McCain and environmental issues, flip a coin. But he and Clinto do have a history of doing some good and it's not too difficult to see McCain doing what is right here, considering that everybody, including corporations, are going green. They've found a way to market it...

Posted on 05/15/2008 at 4:05:33 PM

As someone who is concerned about environmental issues, but who is somewhat apolitical, I found this piece very enlightening. Thanks for the information.

Posted on 05/15/2008 at 5:05:14 AM

Very fine piece here!!!!!!!!!

Posted on 05/15/2008 at 3:05:11 AM

Although I don't agree with McCain on every issue, I was very impressed with his willingness to oppose some in his party on this issue. If you think about it, for him to make a move like this now (which will drive an even bigger wedge between him and many conservatives) represents a real desire for change which is backed up by action and not just rhetoric. It's easy for a candidate to say they want change when all of the ideas they espouse are exactly the same things that their party has been pushing for years. It's quite another thing to have the courage to go against your party and be willing to lose everything in the process. Another fine piece Saul.

Posted on 05/14/2008 at 4:05:09 PM

I was impressed with all three candidates and their commitment to environmentalism--particularly McCain and his willingness to work across party lines. Hillary and Barack have relatively similar platforms on this issue, but like you said, her proposals are more detail oriented while his are more general.

Posted on 05/14/2008 at 3:05:59 PM

Comments 1 - 7 of 7