Gay Marriage Ban Overturned in California

California 2nd State to Allow Same-Sex Marriage

In November of 2006, Carolyn Marshall of the New York Times reported that San Francisco's same-sex marriage ban was to be appealed with the San Francisco Supreme Court. Previously a court agreed that failure to offer
Gay Marriage Ban Overturned in California
Date: December 31, 1969
San Francisco, CA
United States of America
gay marriage was unconstitutional and a state law requiring marriage to be entered into only by a male and female needed to be overturned.

Justice is a labor of love and it works oh so slowly but Thursday, May 15, 2008 was to be the watershed for California and true to form, the state known for being the liberal entertainment capital of the world has not disappointed. A much anticipated ruling finally clearly spelling out whether or not same-sex couples will be permitted to wed just like their opposite-sex counterparts has been made!

According to the ruling made by the California Supreme Court, same-sex marriage is now legal! This makes California the second state, after Massachusetts, where gay and lesbian couples may now wed.

Vindicating the marriages of what 365Gay estimates to be about 8,000 couples sanctioned-then illegally-by San Francisco's mayor Gavin Newsom, the Gay Pride Parades planned for this weekend in Long Beach and other areas are sure to be highly celebratory!

While Lambda Legal, the ACLU, and also the National Center for Lesbian Rights are breaking out the champagne, not everyone is ready to toast this ruling. On the losing end of the argument are the voters who in the 2000 election voted in a ban on gay marriage known as Proposition 22.

California's governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who previously was vociferously against legalizing gay marriage, made a startling 180 degree turn in his opinion when he announced to the Log Cabin Republicans that he would now oppose a constitutional amendment defining marriage as being between one man and one woman. Tony Grew of the UK's Pink News made the startling revelation that instead, the governor was favoring a change of the Constitution to permit those who are naturalized citizens to run for President--a somewhat (perhaps) self-serving statement.

Related information
 
Comments 1 - 5 of 5  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Very good coverage, soar subject, but great job.

Posted on 05/24/2008 at 12:05:10 AM

Being that I reside in Calfornia, this is the most talked about subject out here. The debate is that people from out of state are going to cmoe here just to go thru with the marraige, which means more clutter for california and higher prices.

Posted on 05/17/2008 at 9:05:01 PM

Reliable 1 -- this is the crux of the discussion right now in CA. Has the separation of powers been observed and have the courts interpreted the law, or have they elevated themselves into the shoes of the law makers (i.e. the voters) and overridden their own limitations?

Posted on 05/16/2008 at 8:05:44 AM

Great coverage!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted on 05/15/2008 at 6:05:48 PM

Good coverage!

Posted on 05/15/2008 at 1:05:39 PM

Comments 1 - 5 of 5