Find » Arts & Entertainment » Books » A Comparison of Two Raymond Carver ...

A Comparison of Two Raymond Carver Short Stories

'A Small, Good Thing' as Revision of 'The Bath'

By Mark Yaeger, published Oct 31, 2006
Published Content: 21  Total Views: 24,955  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.0 of 5
A writer’s personal, emotional state is often reflected in his or her writing, and nowhere is this more apparent than in the case of Raymond Carver. Making Literature Matter offers us two of Carver’s stories; the first, entitled “The Bath”, is an original work, while the second, “A Small, Good Thing”, is a revision of the first. While Carver leaves the basic plot and characters mostly unchanged in his revision, he makes many changes that reflect his improved emotional state. Carver wrote “The Bath” in 1981, the final year of a marriage ruined by his alcoholism; the stark, distant, minimalist feel of this story reflects his attitude at this time, no doubt less than cheerful. “A Small, Good Thing” was written a mere 2 years later in 1983, and, while it retains the basic plot of “The Bath”, Carver replaces the story’s stark minimalism with a deeply descriptive, warm sincerity. It is of no small coincidence that this revision was completed at a time when Carver was beginning to turn his life around, successfully enrolling in Alcoholics Anonymous while beginning a new relationship with poet and short story writer Tess Gallagher, which was to last until his death in 1988. As Carver’s personal situation improved, it seems that his concern, and compassion, for his characters did as well. 

Did You Know?
Carver re-wrote the stark and disturbing 'The Bath' as the warmer and more personal 'A Small Good Thing' after a period of alcoholism and ruined relationships gave way to a more sober, happier life
Comments
Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
 
This changes much of your argument about Carver being influenced by his alcoholism or Tess Gallagher as the original story was written at the height of his alcoholism. There's an article about Carver and authorship that you might find interesting in light of your essay. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F03E3D71F38F93AA3575BC0A96E958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all

Posted on 10/17/2007 at 1:10:00 AM

 
This is a good article, but the main premise of your story that Carver wrote "The Bath" first and then revamped it as "A Small, Good Thing," is unfortunately incorrect. The story originally was titled "A Small, Good Thing," and was reworked by Carver and his editor Gordon Lish (some speculate that Lish had a great deal to do with the minimalist feel of the story, "The Bath") and was published as "The Bath," in "What We Talk About When We Talk About Love." In 1983, the poet Donald Hall asked Carver to publish the article in its original form with its original title, "A Small, Good Thing." So while it would seem that Carver wanted to flesh out the story in "The Bath," he and his editor had worked to shorten it from its original length and the original story was published after the edited one had already been published. This changes much of your argument about Carver being influenced by his alcoholism or Tess Gallagher as the original story was written at the height of his alcoholism

Posted on 10/17/2007 at 1:10:00 AM

 
This rox, im so happy to read it!

Posted on 04/17/2007 at 7:04:00 AM

 
Tight article man!!!

Posted on 04/17/2007 at 7:04:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
Advertisment