Why We Hate Conservatives

Adjust font-size: + 
More:ConservativesMichael SavageHypocrisy

The Hypocrisy of Legislating Morality

This so-called Defense of Marriage Act reads: "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California." It is literally a ban on homosexual marriage, enacted through the linguistic trickery of
 "defining" marriage as something other than a legal union representing an existing spiritual bond founded on love and mutual commitment between two individuals.

But, "Allowed"? Conservatives are in an uproar over people being "allowed" to do something that has absolutely nothing to do with them (but happens to conflict with their "values")?

This effort to legislate personal values - by the same people who say they believe in the right of the individual to choose for him or her self - is far from the only instance where Conservatives strive to enforce their mores on everyone. Conservatives, in general, also want to ban abortions, ban drug use, ban pornography, and ban all manner of other things that are absolutely none of their business. Whether you agree with these positions or not, you have to admit that they are nothing less than efforts to restrict the freedom of individuals, and thereby legislate personal choices.

In all fairness, many of those issues, like drug use, do go to matters of safety for the hapless participant. But having matters of morality, like gay marriage, dictated to us by the same people who oppose the restriction of firearms, on the grounds that it infringes on personal liberty, is a tough pill to swallow.

I like to call this kind of contradiction "hypocrisy".

It is a paradox that the group that claims to value individual liberty above society as a whole would then turn around and use oh-so-loathed "I know what's best for you better than you do" laws to tell all of us what is immoral (not "unsafe" or "unfair" or "unjust", but "immoral"). It goes beyond arrogance for these same people to actually participate in the enactment of a law that does absolutely nothing but take away the rights of others, as we saw in California.

These people, who say that it is not the place of government to take away their rights, are actively using government to take away other peoples' rights. It flies in the face of "liberty and justice for all", and puts the lie to their "core values".

Where Liberals might hate themselves for hating others who practice hatred (see Why We Hate Liberals), Conservatives seemingly hate everyone who doesn't share their personal values. And they're out to fix it - by giving you no choice but to conform.

 
Type in Your Comments Below

Well said Joe. I conceed that I used a very broad brush here, but there's a reason for it. One of my main goals in writing these two articles was to lampoon the very idea that because a person is a member of a certain wing his/her ideas are somehow "automatically" correct or incorrect (depending on one's own polarized position). As for the article on Moderates, you're right: there should be one of those too. Blasted indecisive fence-sitters! As those of you who have visited my website know, I'm pretty tied up working on my law degree. But maybe when I'm done I'll take your advice and write a 3rd installment. Thanks for your input.
Where is the "Why We Hate Moderates" article? Though I agree with some of your points in both articles it reads a bit self-righteous. It seems that moderates have a generalized view of both liberals and conservatives... although my assumption is also a generalization ;)
Duranie - I am a conservative and I agree with you entirely. Glad to see I'm not alone.
This whole thing with the Republicans is becoming ridiculous. They are the last people to be legislating morality. It's been too many years that Conservatives and religion has been tied at the hip, where do you think Republicans got this idea that they can tell everyone what to do? To me Conservative=Religion. I am against anyone telling me what to do, and yes, I am a "liberal", but not a left wing nimrod. I think marriage in the religious sense being recognized by government for legal purposes needs to be abolished. We need to start a new type of "marriage" that isn't tied to religion. Make them civil unions, so anyone over 18 can get married (unless they are a blood relation, too many child molesters could slip through that loophole). We have millions of children in foster care, homosexuals should be allowed to adopt. Republicans need to stop trying to force their religious morals on everyone else. I hate all of them.
A thoughtful column. I don't know how it is that liberals got tagged with so much weepy crap as is mentioned above, but since I don't fit that criteria, I will ignore it. I'm a liberal. I don't believe in infringing on someone's rights, period. I'm a liberal. I believe people have the right to make personal choices as long as they are not harming others. I'm a liberal. All men and women, no matter what their race, gender, sexuality, or nationality, are created equal. I'm a liberal. Government is here to provide infrastructure; enforce the laws; expedite the voting process and ensure it is legal; provide disaster relief and aid; protect us; and provide us with the means to pursue life, liberty, and happiness. I'm a liberal. I believe in national health care and a strong defense. I'm a liberal. I believe in We The People. So much for stereotypes.
I think the point was that both sides do it, not either or...
I guess it depends upon how you define a moral issue. Interesting point Bryan.
Tyler, those are all great examples of the left trying to regulate the everyday lives of individuals - however, they aren't morality-based: every one of those things has a legitimate safety concern behind it. I'm not saying laws like that are right, or even necessary, but even if we don't agree with the answer the left provides, I'm sure we can all appreciate the importance of each of those issues being brought up.
Sheryl mentioned Lawrence versus Texas and made your argument for you. She could have gone with smoking bans, seat belt laws, helmet laws, climate change legislations as all examples of the left trying to legislate through morality.
The Lawrence case was another example of a law that tried to regulate how people lived their private lives - by contesting it, no one was forced to change the way he/she lived in order to be in compliance with a law based on the subjective moral values of one group of people. Just because sodomy is no longer illegal in Texas does not mean anyone *has to* partake, you see. Rather, those who do not see it as an immoral act are now *free* to do so. So, the actual situation runs more along the lines of de-legislating morality. That said, you are correct - the Libs are often guilty of attempting to use laws to make up peoples' minds for them - I never said Conservatives were the only ones. What I am saying is that the Conservatives claim to be against that sort of thing most of all, yet do it themselves without so much as batting an eye.
Comments 1 - 10 (of 15) Next >>
Share
Tweet
Share on Facebook
Post a comment
15
12
I like this
Most Commented