Find » Opinion/Editorial » The Roswell Beacon Has Barack Obama...

The Roswell Beacon Has Barack Obama in the Crosshairs

There Are More Tasteful Ways to Be Provocative

By Tina Molly Lang, published May 21, 2008
Published Content: 112  Total Views: 107,120  Favorited By: 101 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.5 of 5
The Roswell Beacon, a Georgia newspaper, is coming under scrutiny for its cover that shows Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama in a gun's crosshairs. The infamous May 15 Roswell Beacon article discussed white supremacist groups in suburban Fulton and Forsyth counties who object to Obama's candidacy and racial background. The Roswell Beacon article also discussed concerns of police and local authorities about possible assassination attempts. While readers were not offended by the Roswell Beacon article itself, it was the provocative cover that drew controversy.

Roswell Beacon has Barack Obama in the Crosshairs: Was it appropriate?

While I can understand the intention behind the Roswell Beacon article (a sobering reminder that we don't live in a color-blind world), I worry that the article may have done more harm than good. In the article, it is implied that people who don't support Barack Obama are "libertarians, gun nuts, conspiracy theorists, leftovers from the militia, and yes, some people who are petrified by Obama and what he represents." 1

The article is justified in pointing out the reactionary and racially motivated sentiments expressed on white nationalist internet forums. According to the Roswell Beacon article, the Secret Service is apparently taking special responsibility for Obama's safety, believing in the possibility of racially motivated assassination attempts. However, while the cover was trying to be provocative, it was probably not the most tasteful way of conveying the message of the article. Is the Roswell Beacon trying to portray Barack Obama as a possible black martyr (in the vein of Martin Luther King)? Black or white, prominent figures tend to be targets for assassination. Lincoln, JFK, Reagan, and Pope John Paul II were cases in point. It's not entirely correct to blame race for everything.

If anything, the Roswell Beacon cover only serves to exacerbate racial tensions. While the newspaper is entitled to exercise freedom of speech, the Roswell Beacon cover couldn't have come at a worse time, given Mike Huckabee's recent blunders.

The Roswell Beacon Has Barack Obama in the Crosshairs
Takeaways
  • The Roswell Beacon's cover of Barack Obama was tasteless and inappropriate, but not incendiary.
  • Black or white, many public figures, including JFK and Reagan were assasination targets.
  • All of the Roswell Beacon covers are edgy and provocative, not just the Barack Obama cover.
Comments
Comments 1 - 15 of 20
Next >>
 
Great reporting on this!

Posted on 06/08/2008 at 8:06:13 AM

 
As much violence as there is in our society (probably fueled by Bush's unnecessary violence in his trumped up war against Iraq), I would not be comfortable with any "crosshairs" cover, whether the target in Democrat or Republican. There has to be a more civil means of dicourse.

Posted on 05/30/2008 at 8:05:54 AM

 
Very interesting. Both sides on this (Rev. Wright & now this paper) are very extremist.

Posted on 05/29/2008 at 11:05:16 AM

 
great article !.......................

Posted on 05/27/2008 at 12:05:01 AM

 
Utterly Ridiculous... http://yappingidiot.com/

Posted on 05/25/2008 at 4:05:38 PM

 
most people dont realize that whoever gets in there clinton or obama or even if they were eachothers vp they dont want a woman or a mixed american in office. so if u idiots believe that she wouldnt be in danger also you are crazy

Posted on 05/24/2008 at 4:05:45 PM

 
And people are upset with Rev. Wright?

Posted on 05/23/2008 at 5:05:57 PM

 
Great job reporting this important story.

Posted on 05/22/2008 at 8:05:24 PM

 
Great Reporting !

Posted on 05/22/2008 at 7:05:02 PM

 
What an awful thing to do :) Sheri

Posted on 05/22/2008 at 4:05:37 PM

 
Really great article, lots of good points!

Posted on 05/22/2008 at 12:05:47 PM

 
:D

Posted on 05/22/2008 at 11:05:40 AM

 
Very interesting considerations.

Posted on 05/22/2008 at 7:05:22 AM

 
Great article, but I still strongly support Mrs. Hilary Rodham Clinton

Posted on 05/22/2008 at 12:05:36 AM

 
:)

Posted on 05/21/2008 at 7:05:04 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 15 of 20
Next >>
Advertisment