Find » Recreation » Firearm Review: Endurance Testing a...

Firearm Review: Endurance Testing a Ruger 10/22 Rifle

My Ruger 10/22 Passes the 100,000 Round Mark

By Mark LeFebre, published Nov 02, 2006
Published Content: 12  Total Views: 227,583  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.3 of 5
Firstly this rifle purchase was never intended as an endurance test.  It just worked out that way.  I keep track of how many rounds each rifle has fired in my shooting logs and recently adding them up I realized my 10/22 had passed the 100,000 rounds fired mark.  I compiled all the data from my shooting logs to publish in this article.  

The rifle was initally purchased in 1999 as a christmas gift for my wife.  She wanted a plinking and small game rifle and as our collection did not include a 10/22 we decided to buy one.  It was ordered through our local dealer as I wanted certain options.  It came with stainless steel finish, scope mount installed, standard barrel profile and full synthetic stock.  It came with one ten round magazine and I purchased three more ten round magazines at that time.  In 2004 when the AWB (assault weapons ban) ended, I bought three thirty round magazines as well.  The gun shot 2" groups out of the box with open sights and under 1" groups with a simmons scope installed.  

The gun never had a formal break in period as it was intended as a plinker and not a target rifle.  Up until January 2003 it was used rarely, and spent most of its time in the weapons locker.  In 2003 I sold the Hammerli 208 target pistol I used the majority of the time and the 10/22 became our primary .22 shooter.  At that time it had about 9,000 rounds through it.  After Jan 2003 it fired an average of about 2000 rounds a month but most shooting was done in the summer time.  At the 80,000 round mark accuracy began to fall off from barrel wear.  The scope was removed and put on another rifle.   At the time of this writing the gun has surpassed the 100,000 round mark and shoots 3" groups.  It has been retired from primiry .22 status and is currently awaiting a new barrel and custom stock as funds allow.  

Takeaways
  • The 10/22 is a durable, dependable rifle
  • Very few parts breakages make it cheap to maintain
  • While not the most accurate .22, it shoots well right out of the box
Did You Know?
Well over 15 million 10/22s have been made and sold since the gun was introduced in 1964
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
 
This was not directed to you, xmissleman.

Posted on 02/21/2008 at 7:02:43 PM

 
I will put my 10/22 standard up against your '66 anyday.

Posted on 02/21/2008 at 7:02:02 PM

 
I really would like to read your comments on any subject, but I am trying to learn the power of wisdom and I fear it would ruin what I now have stored in my tiny brain. I know of 2 instances where a 10/22 did not hold up. One was owned by a man who lived in the basement of my outhouse. The other was you!

Posted on 02/21/2008 at 7:02:32 PM

 
I own a 10/22 and have never had any trouble out of it. It has never failed to funciton perfectly and has always been one of my favorite rifles. It works and looks great! 1000s of rounds fired downrange.

Posted on 11/28/2007 at 9:11:00 PM

 
Bought one on spec as I needed a plinker but wanted accuracy. I thought the old Remington nylon 66 would be a good choice but my son convinved me to get the 10/22. I still haven't forgiven him. accuracy is so-so and failure to eject has been a problem since day 1. Don't buy this piece of crap.

Posted on 09/07/2007 at 10:09:00 AM

 
glad you had such good service from your 10-22. bought a new stainless model and was amazed since i have owned other ruger guns in the past. what a great rifle, first time i shot it it failed to feed, failed to eject and failed to fire. i ended up having to replace the ejector, champfer the chamber,razor sharp edge, hone the trigger surfaces,replace the bolt spring and lengthen the firing pin stop channel to get it to shoot...works now after many hours of work...no wonder there are so many custom parts available. been shooting for 50 years and this is the worst gun i have ever purchased. as for cleaning you can drill a 3/8 inch hole at the back of the receiver in line with the bore and clean from the chamber but you do have to take the stock off.

Posted on 12/06/2006 at 10:12:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
Most Commented On