Stanley Kubrick's The Shining - Masterpiece or Misfire

By John Sanchez, published Nov 03, 2006
Published Content: 147  Total Views: 101,524  Favorited By: 9 CPs
Rating: 4.6 of 5
Twenty-six years ago this past June, Stanley Kubrick’s adaptation of Stephen King’s terrifying best selling novel “The Shining” opened in theaters and soon after the debates began. Had Kubrick crafted, as the ads proclaimed, “the ultimate horror film” or had he produced a monumental misfire?

Critics clearly sided with the latter while audiences were divided into two camps. Those who had read the novel, myself included, were roundly disappointed for the most part. Those who hadn’t read the novel loved the film and believe it to be a modern horror classic, which is evidenced by the fans currently ranking it the 64th best film ever made on the Internet Movie Database.

“The Shining” tells the story of a fragmented family, torn apart by abuse and alcoholism, trying to put the pieces back together by starting over at a Colorado hotel that closes every winter due to the remote mountain location. The Torrance family is hired to maintain the upkeep of the hotel in the off-season. Naturally there are past horrors to be revealed, particularly a former caretaker who murdered his family after going stir crazy due to the desolation. Soon after everyone is gone the ghosts of the Overlook begin to make themselves known, especially to father Jack and son Danny, who has the gift of “shining,” a form of ESP. Jack, now a freelance writer, finds he can’t concentrate on his writing and begins seeing spirits, particularly that of the former murderous caretaker. King’s story was chillingly written with images still embedded in the mind almost 30 years after publication.

Takeaways
  • After the failure of "Barry Lyndon" Kubrick chose "The Shining" for its commercial potential.
  • Jack Nicholson and Shelly Duvall are mis-cast in the lead roles.
  • No film may be as divided in opinion as "The Shining."
Did You Know?
Stanley Kubrick spent over one year for principal photography on this film.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 7 of 7
 
 
http://kubrickfilms.tripod.com/ New Kubrick site with tons of pages, info and analyses. - Matt

Posted on 02/02/2008 at 8:02:29 AM

 
Wow. I love the movie, and thought the book was overwrought (I read first, then watched). So many unforgettable shots! The artificial-looking bits (the final maze scene, etc.) that break the spell for this reviewer, I find very effective. And of course, the music is great.

Posted on 04/01/2007 at 2:04:00 AM

 
The film is Kubrick's commentary on genocide and the tendency of Americans to overlook their bloody, genocidal past, which sets up the cycle of violence to repeat. Remember: This film was made right after Vietnam; this theme is more relevant than ever, what with the debacle that George W. Bush (pro-Vietnam who never served in the country or heard a shot fired in anger) has got us into in Iraq. Bush forgot the past (as Jack Torrance has forgotten the past, and likewise, all Americans) and was condemned to repeat it.

Posted on 11/21/2006 at 3:11:00 PM

 
I am a King fan but I liked the movie. I agree that there wasn't enough development of Nicholson slowly moving to the insane state. Though I miss the status that you Kubrick given his other work. Not for me.

Posted on 11/15/2006 at 2:11:00 AM

 
As a Stephen King fan who read the book long before viewing the movie, a agree that his film was a major disappointment. YOu may want to check out the made for t.v. miniseries, "Stephen King's The Shining" on video. It's really long, but King's screenplay and the talents of Steven Weber, Rececca DeMornay and Courtney Mead bring the story to life in a way that Kubrick's version missed.

Posted on 11/05/2006 at 2:11:00 PM

 
Having read the book before it was adapted for screenplay, I remember anticipating with a great deal of excitement, trying to imagine myself how Stanley Kubrick would tackle King's written masterpiece. I also remember how utterly disappointed I was after seeing it on the big screen, for the same reasons mentioned in this review. If you know of someone out there who has not yet seen the movie(s) versions, do them a huge favor by sending them the book.

Posted on 11/04/2006 at 5:11:00 AM

 
Interesting analysis. I like the writers approach. Now that Ebert is not in the best of health...Hey give this guy a shot. HEY WHY NOT? EBERT & What's this guy's name SANCHEZ. EBERT & SANCHEZ

Posted on 11/03/2006 at 1:11:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 7 of 7
 
Most Commented On