The Dixie Chicks: American Heroes

By Phil Dotree, published Nov 07, 2006
Published Content: 400  Total Views: 639,638  Favorited By: 27 CPs
Rating: 3.5 of 5
This article is a response to Superdork's article, "Why The Dixie Chicks Got Exactly What They Deserved."

First of all, Superdork, you write well, but don't ever give the impression that the war the Dixie Chicks talked about is related to September 11th. Even Bush acknowledges that there's not a direct link between the people we're killing now and the people that killed us in 2001. It's insulting to the memory of said people to draw a connection for a political purpose.

Superdork asserts that the Dixie Chicks practiced their right to free speech, and the backlash against them is another product of that right. I've heard this sort of argument before, and it's missing something crucial; us Dixie Chick defenders aren't claiming some illegality has been visited upon the band. We all recognize that if someone doesn't want to buy a CD, they shouldn't have to. We feel that their music being banned from public airwaves is a form of silly, jingoistic censorship, and we're against that.

Of course, legally a radio station can pull a song off the airwaves. That doesn't mean they should. We're at a scary point in America if we fail to protest a radio station pushing their views on the rest of us. We're not talking about one or two ma-and-pa radio stations taking a song off a play list. This was the outright banning of Dixie Chicks music by major music conglomerates because they had a business interest in the war we're in and the candidates that support that war.

Even for the personally owned stations (which don't exist, but hypothetically), censorship isn't right. Say I own a rock radio station, and I'm a Christian (I don't, and I'm not). If I ban Muslim artists from my airwaves, that would be a jackass thing to do. If my station was successful, it would say something negative about the society we're living in. That is our point; our country is flawed if we have a society where songs are censored for their artists' viewpoints. It's legal, yeah; it's legal to join the Ku Klux Klan, too. You're still a jackass for doing it.

Takeaways
  • Americans should never advocate the silence of free speech.
  • Radio censorship may be legal, but it's still stupid.
  • America needs to recognize that public debate is a good thing.
Did You Know?
All of the Dixie Chicks controversy started over a single comment on a French tour.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
Wasn't lack of a first-ammandment-typ protection the reason why most of our european ancestors came to the new world? The dixie chicks are experiencing a similar type of oppression. My opinion: give them liberty or give all music death!!!

Posted on 10/14/2007 at 11:10:00 PM

 
And I did not say that the Iraq war was directly related to Sep 11, and for me there never needed to be a direct relation. What was formerly in power in Iraq was just another force with the evil intent of destroying America, just like Al Quaeda. And all the rest of the terrorists whose goals are to kill our civilians should be taken out too. I still don't get why they are revered while our own leaders are despised - that, to me, is scary.

Posted on 11/13/2006 at 9:11:00 PM

 
Wow, look what the Read & Win made it possible for me to find! I thank you, Phil, for disagreeing with me respectfully and not personally insulting me in the process. I'm not all about censorship either. And I don't think we're a perfect nation, I think we're an awful mess, but likely for different reasons than you. And it seems just as UNpopular to speak out in support of the war and our president as you say it was for those who spoke out about a problem w/ our country, and we sometimes incur a crazy wrath for doing so. cont....

Posted on 11/13/2006 at 9:11:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Most Commented On