Texas District Judge Barbara Walther Should Be Impeached for Her Role in the FLDS Fiasco

Judge Barbara Walther Violated Her Oath to Protect and Defend the Constitution and Should Be Removed from Office

Now that a Texas appellate court and the Texas Supreme Court have stated unequivocally that Texas 51st District Judge, Barbara Walther, was wrong in ordering the removal of more than 400
 children from the Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints' (FLDS) Yearning For Zion Ranch in Eldorado, Texas, it is time to consider whether or not Judge Walther should be impeached and removed from the bench.

I believe that she should be impeached and removed from the bench and have initiated an online petition calling for her impeachment. Here are my reasons why I think she should be impeached and removed from the bench.

1. Texas District Judge Barbara Walther should be impeached and removed from the bench because she violated the constitutional rights of more than 400 FLDS children and their parents.

No one has summarized the unconstitutional actions of Judge Walther better than the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas. In a message posted on their website, announcing their filing of an amicus brief, they stated:

"The ACLU brief filed today raises a number of concerns about the lack of procedural safeguards employed by the state. First, the ACLU argues that the state failed to provide parents a fair, individualized custody hearing at the highly unusual and frequently chaotic mass proceeding held before a district court on April 17 and 18, 2008. Second, the ACLU asserts that Texas custody law must be applied fairly, impartially, and without bias to the mothers. Finally, the ACLU argument focuses on a parent's right to care for her child, a right both state and federal courts have found to be more "precious" than property rights."

In a statement issued earlier on May 2, 2008, the ACLU of Texas had this to say about the actions of the State of Texas, most of which were ordered or approved by Judge Walther:

"Based upon news reports and other available information, the ACLU has serious concerns that the state's actions so far have not adequately protected the fundamental rights at stake. Specifically, the ACLU is concerned that:

 
Comments 1 - 3 of 3  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

If people are going to molest their children, and run a weird cult. It's probably best to get the kids out of that kind of society. I can understand the judge's reasoning for her decision. Honestly, with the facts that she had to go on at the time, I may have done the same thing. (may, not would have)...I think a group of hot-headed religiously bigoted people should be the last to judge a judge...

Posted on 09/28/2008 at 3:09:17 PM

This is a very good article with really good points. In Oregon, District Judges are elected officials. If this is also true in Texas, I don't think this judge will be re-elected. She is really messed up.

Posted on 06/06/2008 at 11:06:39 AM

Excellent article-and excellent points! I have signed your petition, by the way, and referred to the petition by link in my article: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/804761/constitutional_issues_in_texas_polygamy.html?cat=9 . I didnt realize you were an author here or I certainly would have referred people to your article also. People seem to miss the point of the need to impeach activist judges. Activist judges are attempting to legislate from the bench-the job of legislature. When this is allowed to continue, these self-same judges eventually end up at the Supreme Court level, where they again interpret the Constitution according to their own prejudices rather than what the Constitution actually says. Lower court judges who continually rule in unconstitutional ways such as the restrictions placed on these innocent families eventually are cited in other cases and their rulings become de facto case law. This causes the guarantees promised in the Constitution to become meaningle

Posted on 06/05/2008 at 2:06:41 PM

Comments 1 - 3 of 3