What Shall We Do with the Moon Once We Get There?

One Idea for Enabling a Lunar Settlement

For the first time in over thirty five years, the Moon has become the next frontier. The United States has committed to returning human astronauts to the Moon by the end of the next decade. China has hinted that it intends to do this also. A variety
 of countries, including the United States and China, but also India, Europe, and Japan, have either sent robotic probes into lunar orbit or are on the verge of doing so.

The return to the Moon effort has even become part of American Presidential politics as the various candidates have taken positions for or against the undertaking, Shall we proceed to the Moon or shall we, once again, draw back?

And another question has arisen. What shall we do with the Moon once we get there?

Ideas ranging from scientific exploration, commercial exploitation, and training for future exploration, say of Mars, abound. These are all excellent ideas, but they imply something beyond short term forays as occurred during the Apollo program. They imply a permanent residency of humans on the Moon or, in other words, a lunar settlement.

A lunar settlement, probably located at one of the lunar poles where scientists believe ice exists in permanently shadowed craters, would be a center of science and commerce. Lunar geologists and astronomers would work cheek to jowl with helium 3 miners and lunar tour guides. There would even be a government of some kind, with lawyers and bureaucrats, to sort out disputes and to pass and supervise laws and regulations.

However, if the lunar settlement is to be more than just an Antarctica style science base, some provision would have to be made about private property rights. And there is the rub.

The Outer Space Treaty, which currently governs national activities in space, is silent about private property rights. The treaty does, however, forbid nations from making sovereign claims on territory on other worlds. National sovereignty is the traditional mechanism for guaranteeing private property.

Related information
 
Comments 1 - 7 of 7  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Ownership of land may well be a key to settlement, but it need not suffer from the Outer Space Treaty dilemma - FIrst team to establish a settlement (a facility that supports 4 or more people for at least seven lunar days) should declare independence as a free Lunar republic and annex the territory around their facility, set up a governing council, establish a constitution and charge an immigration fee. They can't claim the whole moon, and they can't stop other teams from establishing their own lunar republics. Eventually, there "city states" will likely want to band together - for trade, defense, and development, possibly creating the United Lunar States.

Posted on 06/09/2008 at 3:06:53 PM

I believe we need to put of a toll booth so that we can charge admission to China and India. Also, they need to receive the pamphet that outlines the rules that the US has applied to the moon (having arrived in 1969). Rule # 3 allows them a five minute photo opportunity with their country's flag...but a fine will be levied if they it behind. Clean up fees and the like. A golf safety course will be offered to any interested visitors. Garrison Keilor will, sporadically, be available to read selections from his latest work... "Tell Mission Control it's Roquefort."

Posted on 06/09/2008 at 10:06:43 AM

Upon reading this article, the first question that i had was why it would take till the end of the next decade for there to be another lunar landing? Why is it so hard for us to go there now when we were able to do it back in 1969 with less sophisticated technology? And as for a lunar vehicle, the first one drove on the moon in 1971 without any major problems. Since those rovers are still on the moon, why not use them again? Are we saying that with all our advances in computers and technology, the men and women who worked on the space program nearly 40 years ago were better equipped to handle the moon. If we want to go back to the moon, I'm sure that NASA still has the blueprints for the lunar lander sitting somewhere.

Posted on 06/09/2008 at 10:06:57 AM

Look for Elvis!

Posted on 06/09/2008 at 6:06:51 AM

I think the only workable property rights solution at the moment, when there are no Lunar nations, is an extension of the law of salvage and of finds, whereby a piece of lunar territory becomes a homestead on the basis of human usage. It is after all, the basis for the Mabu verdict in Australia concerning the rights of the Australian aboriginals to their property - ie, they found the land, they made use of it for well over forty thousand years, therefore they were the original owners; even better, it forces the wanna-be owners of the Moon to focus on actually getting there in the first place; and it prohibits the abhorrent "absentee landlord" phenomenon, which is guaranteed to stifle any utilization of outer space in its cradle. (Mark my words, the instant any state gets a throttle-hold on Earth Orbit access a la the SDI of not-so-distant memory, utilization of Earth Orbit and Outer Space collapses - the one with the throttle-hold in particular, because it doesn't have to compete.)

Posted on 06/09/2008 at 3:06:20 AM

Build a telescope.

Posted on 06/09/2008 at 12:06:39 AM

What few seem to be focusing on is WHY the current lunar program seems to be going in the wrong direction. Sadly, the entire set of 10 major vehicle components used on each lunar mission would be thrown away. We had a golden chance to build at least a partly re-usable lunar transport system, but NASA is refusing to move even an inch in that direction. There are no plans to even allow the current designs to be converted later into re-usable vehicles. This will make each new lunar mission cost billions of dollars, comparable to the cost of Apollo missions. It would also put lunar crews at risk, since there would be no backup module if there was a failure during ascent to lunar orbit from the surface. Any lunar settlement, (vs a government science base), cannot exist without income. To produce income, you need to make a profit on something. No profit-making lunar-based economy can possibly exist based on all expendable boosters and space vehicles.

Posted on 06/08/2008 at 10:06:22 PM

Comments 1 - 7 of 7