White House Loses Boumediene Case: Supreme Court Sides Against Bush, Protects Habeas Corpus
A Victory for Habeas Corpus, but Unanswered Questions Remain
By Tina Molly Lang, published Jun 12, 2008
Published Content: 97 Total Views: 85,893 Favorited By: 98 CPs
Embed:
The Supreme Court has sided against the Bush Administration in the Boumediene case, saying that the White House cannot refuse prisoners habeas corpus unless it does so under the Constitution's Suspension Clause. The Suspension Clause only allows for suspension in cases of rebellion or invasion. In effect, foreign terrorism suspects being held at Guantanamo Bay will have constitutional rights to appeal their detentions. Boumediene vs. Bush challenged the legality of Lakhar Boumediene's detention at Guantanamo Bay. Lakhar Boumediene is an Algerian native and naturalized citizen of Bosnia. He was arrested after Sept. 11 when he was suspected of plotting an attack against the United States Embassy in Sarajevo.
The Supreme Court voted 5-4 in favor of Boumediene.
White House loses Boumediene Case: The Supreme Court decision
Anthony Kennedy, the traditional swing voter of the Supreme Court, wrote the majority opinion for Boumediene vs. Bush. Citing the 1803 Marbury vs. Madison case, he wrote that "To hold that the political branches may switch the Constitution on or off at will would lead to a regime in which they, not this court, say 'what the law is,' " Kennedy also argued that the Suspension Clause "protects the rights of the detained by a means consistent with the essential design of the Constitution. It ensures that, except during periods of formal suspension, the Judiciary will have a time-tested device, the writ, to maintain the 'delicate balance of governance' that is itself the surest safeguard of liberty." Joining Anthony Kennedy were the traditionally liberal justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Stephen Breyer.
On the dissenting side of Boumediene vs. Bush were traditionally conservative justices John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. Antonin Scalia argued that America was "at war with radical Islamists," and that the ruling "will almost certainly cause more Americans to get killed."
White House loses Boumediene Case: Effects of the Supreme Court Decision
White House Loses Boumediene Case: Supreme Court Sides Against Bush, Protects Habeas Corpus
You may also like...
- George W. Bush Kisses His Boyfriend Good...
- Bush Loses Boumediene Case
- Pigeon Poops on Bush, Rest of World Jeal...
- Pervez Musharraf, the World Leader Whose...
- Bush White House Preparing for Possible ...
- The Government Battle On Spending: Presi...
- Bush and Cheney's Grand Plan
- ACLU Supports Arkansas Judge over Bush C...
- White House Defends Bush Decision to Com...
Takeaways
- Under the Boumediene ruling, foreign nationals detained at Guantanamo will have habeas corpus rights
- In a divided Supreme Court, moderate Anthony Kennedy was the swing vote.
- The Supreme Court ruling on Boumediene demonstrates the effectiveness of checks and balances.
Most Commented On


Brad Sylvester
Add a Comment
Posted on 07/12/2008 at 5:07:23 PM
Sheryl Young
Add a Comment
Posted on 06/28/2008 at 12:06:47 PM
SkyeDanzer
Add a Comment
Posted on 06/23/2008 at 5:06:40 AM
SAIKAT KUMAR DUTTA
Add a Comment
Posted on 06/17/2008 at 3:06:51 AM
M. Kaye Hash
Add a Comment
Posted on 06/16/2008 at 6:06:52 PM
Melanie Schwear
Add a Comment
Posted on 06/16/2008 at 10:06:19 AM
Marie Lowe
Add a Comment
Posted on 06/15/2008 at 8:06:55 PM
Joshua McMorrow-Hernandez
Add a Comment
Posted on 06/14/2008 at 9:06:13 PM
Shanelle Diaz
Add a Comment
Posted on 06/13/2008 at 10:06:39 AM
Kat V
Add a Comment
Posted on 06/13/2008 at 7:06:37 AM
3lilangels
Add a Comment
Posted on 06/13/2008 at 6:06:28 AM
P.V. Ariel
Add a Comment
Posted on 06/13/2008 at 5:06:44 AM
robsmom
Add a Comment
Posted on 06/13/2008 at 5:06:27 AM
Sheri Fresonke Harper
Add a Comment
Posted on 06/12/2008 at 11:06:56 PM
R. Elizabeth C. Kitchen
Add a Comment
Posted on 06/12/2008 at 10:06:04 PM