Book Review: Contempt: How the Right is Wronging American Justice -- Catherine Crier

Contempt: How the Right is Wronging American Justice -- Catherine Crier (Rugged Land Books, 2005)

There are important books that help define our times, books that need to be read. Catherine Crier has written a book that exposes the conservative and ultraconservative right swing in American politics for its true mission -- the unadulterated and
 uninhibited ability to dictate how everyone must live as defined by a narrow set of Judeo-Christian ideals as interpreted by the aforementioned political right.

Sounds a bit authoritarian? A little toward the dictatorial? Maybe somewhat oligarchical? Frighteningly theocratic? You're correct; it does. It is. Contempt is a book that shows the utter disregard for the original intent of the Constitution's framers (although a common tactic of the right is that they wish to return to the "original intent" of the founders -- while the rewrite said "intent") when making decisions in the highest courts in the land. She systematically tracks the slow but sure takeover of the Republican Party by the fundamentalist evangelical Christian movement, and how this well-funded and tenacious minority has consistently attacked and infiltrated our highest courts. Crier also submits exhibits of the various court cases that are undermining our basic civil liberties one by one.

This book saw print just before known conservative John Roberts was appointed to the Supreme Court, before Chief Justice Rehnquist died, before Roberts assumed his vacant bench seat, before the equally conservative Samuel Alito was appointed to replace the resigning Sandra Day O'Connor. She highlights the fact that the high courts of this nation have been taken over by increasingly conservative judges pushing their backward lock-stepping ideologies of revisionist history and skewed religious doctrine. She names names and points fingers, calling four powerful movers and shakers The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: businessman C. Boyden Gray, intellectualist Leonard A. Leo, politician Edwin Meese, and probably the most dangerous of them all, religious leader Jay Sekolow.

 
Comments 1 - 4 of 4  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

It is a very interesting book, 3lilangles, and even moreso due to the fact that it comes from one on the conservative right. Just goes to show that it isn't just people like far left liberals like Naomi Wolf and Ariana Huffington who see the the goal-oriented movement for what it is. The religious right scared a few people with their power in the past couple decades but awareness of that powerful movement has also muted it a bit. That does not mean it has disappeared. They've merely shifted tactics and are quietly assuming positions of power (for the most part; however, there are still a few who stridently carry the banner). The overall strategy remains the same: Take over the courts so that when right wing legislation is passed, you can support it; if left-wing legislation is passed, you can strike it down. This is all about building legal precedence. Moral authoritarians would have it no other way...

Posted on 06/19/2008 at 11:06:39 AM

To a certain extent, Charlie K, you are correct. There seems to be extremes vying for dominance with very little in the way of mediation, moderation, or cooperation. However, the idea of a radical religious right controlling our legal system with their moral authoritarianism and ridiculous revisionism is not something I want to see come to pass.

Posted on 06/19/2008 at 11:06:40 AM

Well written review, sounds quite interesting!!!!!!!!!

Posted on 06/19/2008 at 7:06:32 AM

Interesting review. I think both the right and the left have gone off their rockers.

Posted on 06/19/2008 at 6:06:15 AM

Comments 1 - 4 of 4