Is Ultimate Fighting Safer Than Boxing?

By Stephen Schultz, published Nov 11, 2006
Published Content: 64  Total Views: 53,473  Favorited By: 2 CPs
Rating: 2.9 of 5
For those of you that have not followed the popular fight-sport of ultimate fighting, here is a brief summation. Essentially, ultimate fighters are allowed to either use striking forms of combat (kicking, punching) or grappling forms of combat (choke holds, limb breaking/injuring holds) to get their opponent to either give up or go unconscious.

Sounds safe, right?

Well, let’s put it in context. Ultimate fighting is a type of mixed martial arts (MMA) that combines various fighting styles into one cohesive approach. Ultimate fighting comes in two dominate forums: the Ultimate Fighting Championships (UFC) in the United States or the Pride fights in Japan.

The original premise behind ultimate fighting was to compare fighting styles. In the ultimate fighting format karate, judo, boxing, wrestling and other fight experts could compare their skills to others. Would karate beat judo? In ultimate fighting you could find out.

Up to the point of the inception of the UFC and ultimate fighting as a whole, boxing was the predominant popular fighting sport. With a decline in top promotional names in the boxing arena of late, the popularity of ultimate fighting has been on the rise.

But is boxing or ultimate fighting safer? There are several reasons that ultimate fighting may indeed be safer regarding severity of injuries than boxing. There are also some very clear statistical analyses that indicate that ultimate fighting is indeed safer than boxing. What follows is a list of these points.

1. There have been a much higher rate of deaths in boxing than in ultimate fighting. According to statistics, boxing averages roughly 11 deaths per year (see “boxing deaths” in other resources section). In an unsanctioned ultimate fighting bout outside of the US there has been one recorded death that was related to ultimate fighting. This has been the only fatality ever recorded regarding ultimate fighting.

2. Even American football has more deaths per year than ultimate fighting (see “football deaths” in extra resources).

Is Ultimate Fighting Safer Than Boxing?

Ultimate fighting includes both striking attacks and submission holds. This is an attempted triangle-choke.

Credit: Stephen Schultz

Copyright: Stephen Schultz

Resources
  • Boxing deathsFootball deathsLong term
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
Great article. There are quicker knockouts in MMA because the smaller gloves can more easily hit their target and a lot cleaner than a boxing glove can. Actually boxing rounds are longer Donche or Douche bag whatever his name is. Boxing is twelve three minute rounds, mma is three five minute rounds and for titles five five minute rounds. Look at the statistics, one death in sanctioned mma. Boxing averages a lot more than that per year. Boxing in general is hating the new kid on the block and for good reason since they average about 250,000 viewers per televised event and the UFC does 2.5 million for a free fight card I 'd be sad too. Especially since mma is so new and markets itself the opposite of boxing. Who wants to pay money for a fight that has three fights and only one of those is really good, or you can buy eight fights where the combatants actually come to fight and not just dance around?

Posted on 07/07/2008 at 9:07:28 PM

 
It is not true that MMA rounds are shorter than boxing. MMA rounds are 5 minutes, boxing rounds are 3 minutes. Also, contrary to popular belief, boxing gloves are designed to protect the boxer's hands, NOT his opponent. Their hands are their most valuable asset.

Posted on 07/06/2008 at 12:07:34 PM

 
shap shapp shappy

Posted on 01/03/2008 at 11:01:27 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Most Commented On