Find » Society » History » The Majority Vote?

The Majority Vote?

Victory Voting

By Agaric, published Nov 06, 2006
Published Content: 339  Total Views: 528,297  Favorited By: 25 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.6 of 5
Whether metaphorically or otherwise, I think most of us have a champagne bottle in one hand, and a gun in the other. We are waiting anxiously for the polls to close tomorrow and the midterm election results to come in for November 7th, 2006. But what are we all anticipating? That there will be one winner and one loser. Either the Republican Party will retain a majority in both houses, or lose that majority in one or more houses to the Democratic Party. If the party we personally support claims victory, we will uncork that champagne and feel a sense of great relief. If our party loses, then we will be charged in an ever-bitter crusade of ill-feeling.

What exactly is important in a majority? Well, in this day and age, a majority in Congress means that a party can push its agenda more freely through both houses. Or can it? Frankly our Senate and House of Representatives are becoming more like pre-Revolutionary France and less like the United States of America. The majority party essentially expects its members to vote as one giant mass, thus trumping the smaller party absolutely. The nobles and clergy in France tried to do this in order to eclipse any influence of the less powerful Third Estate. But if party members are expected to vote with their constituents on nearly every issue (except for a couple touchy ones like torture), then why do American citizens vote for individual representatives? Why are there over four hundred members of the House and one hundred in the Senate?

The minority party in Congress doesn't have to be the minority. It is made the minority. If the majority party votes as one giant coagulated blob, then the minority will need to do the same or else forfeit all of its influence in matters. Thus, we see things such as filibusters that drag out Senate proceedings to no end, until a bill is killed. A filibuster is a useful and important tool in the senate, but the way the trend is going in Congressional matters, the filibuster will come to be used more and more. Because neither party wants to concede to the other, then hardly any lasting or marginally important legislation will ever be passed.

The Majority Vote?

Tick Tock.

Credit: Matthew Wendus

Copyright: Matthew Wendus

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 7 of 7
 
 
I come to this article long after the election, but it still is powerful and could be written at any time in our country's recent history or present. So many politicians, including the president, put lip service to bipartisanship, but never truly believe in it. Even now, after a strong signal from the country about the failure in Iraq, the president refuses to accept the need for a change in strategy. You are absolutely right about people digging in their heels for the need to be right instead of finding an effective solution to what ails us as a country. Bravo!

Posted on 12/23/2006 at 12:12:00 PM

 
I wish there were more viable parties on the American political landscape. If there were many to choose from, for any party to hold majority it would have to be by consensus and coalition building. Not perfect, but a place to start.

Posted on 11/10/2006 at 9:11:00 PM

 
Great article

Posted on 11/06/2006 at 7:11:00 PM

 
Nicely written.

Posted on 11/06/2006 at 5:11:00 PM

 
Wow. I love your work. The more I read on AC, the less I think of those major news broadcasters that fill time by arguing over meaningless numbers, half-truths, and outright lies. I think more people are going to bet less on the winning team and more for the winning individuals. Just look at Bush support high and low amongst Republicans, and Dems lining up to support Arnold and not Angeledis in California for the governor race. When Arnold wins, people are going to be shocked at how a decisive victory was achieved in the "free thinking, liberal" California by a testosterone-filled Republican. But he does a lot for environment and people here. It's becoming less and less a party system, and that is good.

Posted on 11/06/2006 at 3:11:00 PM

 
Wonderfully written...I completely agree, though I could never communicate it so eloquently. A refreshing dose of reality, sense and objectivity. Genius at best, idealism at worst. But, most of all I'm thinking, "Why is it so hard for the majority of our country to understand this?"

Posted on 11/06/2006 at 12:11:00 PM

 
Give this man a Nobel prize! Unfortunately, the Democrats will have no choice but to exercise tight party control for a period of time, in order to reverse the damages wrought by the GOP in a number of areas of governance (esp tax cuts, student loans, environmental regs, FCC, etc). But after cleaning up the mess of their predecessors, I too would welcome much more genuine attempts at reaching across the aisle and putting our country back on track.

Posted on 11/06/2006 at 11:11:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 7 of 7
 
Most Commented On