Find » Opinion/Editorial » Focus on the Founding: Freedom of S...

Focus on the Founding: Freedom of Speech and the Press

By Steven K. Speight, published Jun 19, 2008
Published Content: 19  Total Views: 1,106  Favorited By: 2 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.7 of 5
What follows is one of a series of articles on the intent of the Founding Fathers with respect to our rights, focusing primarily, but not exclusively, on those enumerated in the Bill of Rights.

First, from one of the most important Founders, Thomas Jefferson:

"On every question of construction, let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was 

adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be

squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed."
Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, June 12, 1823

Now, no one can argue that freedom of speech and freedom of the press are vastly important parts of our free Republic. Without freedom of speech, ideas are easy to suppress. Without freedom of the press knowledge is easy to control.

George Washington said, "If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."

Benjamin Franklin wrote a poem entitled "On Freedom of the Press." He also noted that "Without Freedom of thought, there can be no such Thing as Wisdom; and no such Thing as Public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech."

Samuel Adams argued, "That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to 

infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people

of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms..."

Thomas Jefferson wrote "No government ought to be without censors & where the press is free, no one ever will," in a letter to George Washington

So, the Founding Fathers certainly held freedom of speech and the press to be vitally important.

Yet, the founders also showed an understanding of the danger unfettered free speech can be.

Comments
Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
 
I agree. The reporting on Katrina was atrocious. Dan Rather and CBS running a story without verifying the information included. The list goes on and on. I shudder to think what would have happened with that CBS story before the internet. It would have been believed outright. The people are doing a good job - one they shouldn't need to do - at keeping them as honest as possible.

Posted on 06/24/2008 at 10:06:41 AM

 
I believe in reading my history, that the founder's true intent with the provision of freedom of the press was to guarantee that the press would act also as a 'check' on the government and it's abridgement of it's Constitutional functions and enumerated powers, not as rags to personally attack anyone and everyone for circulation and profit. In their day, newspapers were free and funded largely by donations as non-profits - not the huge 'corporate' or conglomerate media companies they are today, who answer to Boards of Directors and investors and have agendas and the corporate bottom line as their goal, and not so much truth in reporting anymore. Same with the 'news' on most local and national television stations. Half truths and innuendo are what sells, and not truth or fact based reporting or as a 'watch' on governmental abuses and Constitutional faux paxs. The candidates have 'press agents' now and so do most of those members in Congress and 'handlers.' The net is the real news

Posted on 06/24/2008 at 8:06:32 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
Advertisment