Could Barack Obama Win Georgia? Georgia Polling Indicates Obama, John McCain in Dead Heat

Libertarian Candidate Bob Barr May Prove Spoiler in Presidential Race

The John McCain campaign is probably already sick of hearing "Yes, We Can." They will no doubt be even more nauseous if those chants turn into "Yes, We Did." A case in point: the state of Georgia, which is rated "Safely Republican" by Rasmussen and has not
Could Barack Obama Win Georgia? Georgia Polling Indicates Obama, John McCain in Dead Heat
 voted for a Democrat in a general election since 1992 when Bill Clinton narrowly defeated George H. W. Bush to carry the state, may actually be edging toward the bluer side of the political spectrum. A recent poll conducted by an Atlanta-based polling organization, Insider Advantage, has the presidential race in Georgia at a dead heat.

Conducted on June 18, the Insider Advantage poll shows Senator John McCain with a one point advantage over Senator Barack Obama, 44% to 43%. The significance of this poll rests in the remaining 13% of the poll numbers. In all other polls, according to RealClearPolitics.com, McCain leads by double digits in the conservative state, but add in native son Bob Barr, who has been nominated as the Libertarian candidate for president, and you have a virtual tie. Bob Barr, a popular former Republican Georgia congressman, polls at 6%, leaving 7% undecided. Still, that 6% eats away at the McCain lead and could prove to be John McCain's undoing in Georgia in the general election, siphoning off just enough disaffected Republican voters from McCain for him to lose Georgia and its 15 electoral college votes.

Rasmussen polls showed John McCain with a ten-point lead on June 10 (51% to 41%), a reduced lead compared to the 14-point margin he enjoyed a month before (53% to 39%).

And that isn't all the bad news for the McCain campaign. It just might get worse.

 
Comments 1 - 8 of 8  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Well, the long and short of it rests here, Demetria: if people want change, they had best vote for a Democratic president, Democratic senators, and Democratic congressmen. Otherwise, you are going to see a hung-up, filibustered Congress and a president who will only be as effective as the legislation that eventually crosses his desk. As it stands today, the Democrats have only a small majority, just enough for the Republicans to filibuster, not enough to override any presidential veto, and be labeled as "do-nothing." For there to be adequate or even recognizable legislative change in the U.S., one party or the other has got to have a clear voting majority. Neither party has that at present. You want Congress to actually do something, you have to vote a clear majority of one party into Congress. That party at present would be Democratic, unless you want continued corporate deregulation, insufficient governmental funding, a war that's an economy crusher, tax breaks for the wealthy.

Posted on 07/01/2008 at 10:07:03 AM

This whole election process is about change and that seems to be the undercurrent in every area. Even in terms of things being the way they've always been. I don't just mean because that Obama's buzz word but it just seems to be something carried on the breeze that is informing every apect of the process. I don't put a lot of stock in polls because no one truly knows what goes on once people are in the voting booth. Everyone's heard the jokes about drunk people in voting booth's voting for the wrong people. Things change... no pun.

Posted on 06/30/2008 at 3:06:57 PM

And it may not be a question of inaccuracies in the polls, either, Tyler. The polls could be accurate when they're conducted. People change their minds. Some who say they would vote for Nader or Barr may come to the realization that they're wasting their vote and then cast it for one of the other candidates. For Obama's sake, he may want to hope that those numbers remain steady...

Posted on 06/30/2008 at 1:06:02 PM

I suspect Barr's numbers will go down once people get in the voting booth. Nader also polls higher then what he ends up with. I have no idea if there is any shenanigans going on at the polling stations or if it deals with just inaccurate polls.

Posted on 06/30/2008 at 1:06:37 PM

It seems that several states that have been red states for quite some time have come back into play for this election, Jacob. An analyst on CNN (I forget which, but I'm certain they were an Obama supporter) the other night predicted a landslide victory for Obama and they might be right. However, to put things into perspective, it is only June and the GOP hasn't gotten their collective might centered on Obama just yet. When they do, we'll see then how Obama's numbers stand up...

Posted on 06/29/2008 at 11:06:32 AM

it would be very interesting if things continue this way, currently NC is a close race as well, a possible 2 blue southern states! great reporting!

Posted on 06/29/2008 at 11:06:53 AM

Thank you, 3lilangels...

Posted on 06/28/2008 at 11:06:04 AM

Very nice reporting here, thanks!!!!!

Posted on 06/27/2008 at 4:06:08 AM

Comments 1 - 8 of 8