Death of a President: Burn Him in Effigy

Is This an Immoral Portrayal of the Murder of a Live, Sitting President

By Codie Leonsch Hartwig, published Nov 15, 2006
Published Content: 173  Total Views: 73,381  Favorited By: 29 CPs
Rating: 4.3 of 5
I spoke with a handful of people as we were leaving a viewing of Death of a President. I asked them what they thought. One college-age woman said, "Well - I think its done well, but as to it being controversial, I don't think it was that controversial. I mean there's all this controversy around it, and don't think its controversial. Its more like a look-ahead movie."

Another woman with much gray in her hair said, "Bush inspired me to do something I've never done in my life. In the Bush / Gore election, I went straight down the ticket, didn't even glance at the names, and voted a straight Democratic ticket. I don't like Bush. I want Bush impeached, and it irks me that no one will even talk about it after the Clinton travesty. I think Bush should be impeached, but I think a movie about killing him is immoral." 

This woman's friend said, "I want Bush impeached, too, but not assassinated. This movie makes me feels sympathetic toward him, and I sure didn't have any sympathy for him when I walked in! Its like, yeah, well, I'm not happy that he's not impeached, but at least he's not murdered." The younger professional woman standing nearby said, "That's right. I feel sympathetic, too. So what is this meant to be? It looks like it is meant to be against Bush, but maybe its really meant to be for him. Because I feel sympathetic to him now, too. I feel like I should go home and phone him to make sure he's all right."

I went home feeling under a heavy cloud of burden spread by the realism of the docu-film Death of a President; I felt like I should buy a black dress from Chadwick's and make plans for a funeral. This is a pronounced effect to be had from a movie. I still can't quite shake the gloom.

People are by nature imitative. Look at dressing trends throughout our history, for example. Towns folk and villagers all adorned themselves in the same array; it was the village costume or the national costume. You can still see vestiges of it in European countries. But the documentation of the imitative trait goes all the way back to the Mycenaean empire. And faith in our human monkey-see-monkey-do gene is what made Tom Sawyer and Mark Twain famous. 

Death of a President: Burn Him in Effigy

Actual documentary footage is combined with superb documentary style acting narratives to give a chillingly authentic feel to this questionable docu-film by UK director and collaborative writer Gabriel Range and Simon Finch.

Credit: More4 Channel 4

Copyright: Associated Press

Takeaways
  • Impeaching Bush is legal: why not make a docu-movie about impeaching Bush?
  • Many people want Bush dead, no one sane wants him dead.
  • Sympathy for Bush is built through watching Death of a President.
Did You Know?
A UK news broadcaster, this is director Gabriel Range's second film. He has collaborated with co-writer, Simon Finch, on several TV projects in the UK. Death of a president made its debut at the Toronto Film Festival in hopes of finding an American Distributor.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
 
Heh. Word limit. Here's the rest of it. ...Even the negative publicity (theatres told their patrons that they wouldn't show it; normally, people would flock to other theatres and make the movie a hit - this didn't happen and it's more or less forgotten now) couldn't save this movie from mediocrity. Now, if you want a real and serious discussion about Presidential assassination and consequence, read "Checkpoint" by Nicholson Baker. The quality of the writing is debatable, but he makes so many good points (on both sides) that it's worth checking out.

Posted on 01/07/2007 at 12:01:00 PM

 
Codie said "...the intent was to show the great tragedy that would be realized were Bush to be lost, as opposed to advocating the benefit of such a thing..." The problem is that they do NOT show the real consequences of this possibility. There is no real discussion about the very real effects on the country and its policies beyond a vague reference to "The Patriot Act 3," which is NEVER followed up. Instead, to paraphrase James Berardinelli, the movie is solely concerned with showing that it might not be a good thing to be a Muslim in today's highly blame-happy world. I would have liked to see what real decisions Cheany would make, to the betterment or detriment of the nation. I would have liked to see if anyone in the nation would have the guts to stand up and say "Damn it, I don't care who the President is, if you shoot him you're a criminal!" I would have liked to see a more intelligent movie, and I didn't. It was a one-note movie, with one draw. Even the negative publicity (t

Posted on 01/07/2007 at 12:01:00 PM

 
Unfortunately, this movie is a typical example of one-note film-making. Why did anyone care about Shortbus? Because there was unsimulated sex in it. Why does anyone care about this movie? Because it shows the assassination of George Bush. The people who hate Bush will back it completely because they hate Bush; no other reason. The people who like Bush will vilify it because they like Bush; no other reason. And that's it. It had no message, no statement, no real reason to be notable at all except that it shows Bush getting killed. It is a purposeless movie with one single exploitative draw, and has no other merit.

Posted on 12/17/2006 at 1:12:00 PM

 
Deeply analytical and observant (where did you go to college?!?). Although, Tamara contends, and the director/writer(s), Range and Finch, seem to confirm that the intent was to show the great tragedy that would be realized were Bush to be lost, as opposed to advocating the benefit of such a thing. Still, putting such ideas into the universe is never a wise thing to do. We've lost contact with the profundity of our actions through existential dispair.

Posted on 11/16/2006 at 7:11:00 AM

 
It's easier for them to hate Bush than to state an alternative.

Posted on 11/16/2006 at 6:11:00 AM

 
there are those unstable enough to imitate that sort of thing. it is easier to be against something (someone) than to be for anything of your own, i believe.

Posted on 11/15/2006 at 3:11:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
Most Commented On