The Texas "Law of Parties" (7.02)

When They Execute You for Just Being There

When you think of executions and death row, do you picture a cold blooded murderer? Someone who has committed a heinous crime? Locked up to protect the rest of society? Someone who must be executed or else they will kill again? If that is the image that comes to your mind, you may be
 surprised to find out that this is not necessary the case.

Executions are not reserved just for the most heinous crimes anymore, and actually there are states considering the crime of child rape, to be punishable by death. Louisiana has already sent one man to death row for a crime of rape, and not murder. According to The Christian Science Monitor, Patrick Kennedy has been sentenced to die for the rape of a minor.

Along with Louisiana, South Carolina, and Texas are also considering "child rape" to be punishable by death.

Nobody likes a child rapist, and our children must be protected somehow, but aren't there alternatives, other than the death penalty? I feel if we start killing rapists, along with murderers, what will be next? Is our nation turning the death penalty into an alternative to prison?

The leading state of executions, Texas, has another law on their books that allows someone to be sentenced to die for being present at the scene of the crime. That law is called the Texas Law of Parties (7.02). It's a law that claims you can be "criminally responsible for the conduct of another." You don't have to necessarily be the "triggerman," and the courts can know this, but yet they can sentence you to die. Over 80 inmates are said to be at The Polunsky Unit in Livingston Texas are on death row, sentenced under "The Law of Parties." Inmates that the courts know have not actually murdered anyone.

According to Texas Legislation website you can be sentence to death according to the Law of Parties if:

Related information
  • Over 80 inmates are said to be on texas death row under the "Law of Parties"
  • Texas can execute you for just being at the scene.
  • Read about the Law of parties
 
Comments 1 - 9 of 9  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

How can the law of parties be implemented correctly when the innocent are getting life and the ones that actually hit and hurt this person with a medal object is the states witness and she will say anything that they want her to say and well she actually gets only 20 years and she did hit this person with a medal object along with her cousins and the ones that did not hurt or hit this person and did not intend to hurt this person and were only there and were scared and did not know what to do because they were scared was given a life sentence for not hitting or hurting this person there was no plan but the states witness says there was well she had to say what they wanted to hear because she will be out this year and she only served only 20 years her lies and the overzeaulos district attorneys that wanted to convict everyone on the law of parties give the real killers a pat on the back and the lies were welcomed and recorded in the courts how fair do you think the law of parties is use

Posted on 05/26/2009 at 8:05:42 PM

Kim Barnett, I disagree, for many reasons. This law was established 1860's for bank robbers & murderers, acting together, for one intended purpose. It's now seldom used, in our court system, but let me ask you a question. Do you know anyone, or know of anyone, that have been victims, of drive-by shootings? A case I'm working on, is of this nature of crime, & although the same individuals were involved, after the first attempt failed, they repeated their second attempt, with another shooter, of the same group, all being participants in both drive-by's. Since the vehicle used in both, was a rental, & two of the occupants were shooters on different dates, with the same intended targets, this statute should have been applied, & wasn't! I should also mention, that in the interrogation/ arrest, confessions procedures, there was 'no' remorse shown, given, or intended, in regards to their crimes or their victims. This is a prime example of this statute, & it's importance, to sta

Posted on 08/23/2008 at 2:08:50 PM

I agree. What can we do? Please give me names, address and a direction and i will help in trying to change this. I think it needs to be abolished. Also we need to get the word out about it. So many people have no idea that this law is in effect.

Posted on 08/13/2008 at 7:08:30 PM

My husband was sentenced under 'Law of Parties' in the Great state of TEXAS I think maybe some one who is actually guilty should just have a simple charge not to be charged with the crime, then next they add more by 'law of Parties' Just some more drama really. just make it one charge not add another one to it.

Posted on 07/17/2008 at 9:07:34 PM

I believe that all criminals need to be punished. That punishment does not have to be death penalty though.

Posted on 06/26/2008 at 10:06:24 AM

Always a great job thanks!!!!!

Posted on 06/26/2008 at 3:06:34 AM

Thanks Dee..another great article!

Posted on 06/25/2008 at 10:06:12 AM

I am against the death penalty period. Life is prison should work, but nobody has the right to take another person's life. Just my opinion.

Posted on 06/25/2008 at 9:06:48 AM

I actually am pro death penalty for proven serial killers, but no one else. This is a travesty

Posted on 06/25/2008 at 9:06:44 AM

Comments 1 - 9 of 9