Why English Is (But Shouldn't Be) the International Language

Because an International Language is Not What the World Needs

By Terry Dip, published Nov 27, 2006
Published Content: 39  Total Views: 15,980  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Rating: 2.7 of 5
Paris. At a cafe outside the Pantheon, I see a group of Japanese tourists, all women between their 20's and 50's, telling a waiter in broken English, "Something to drink, please...non-alcoholic."

Costa Rica. Far away from any major city, I get an ear infection and have to go to the doctor, who asks me if I speak Spanish. I can chat in the language, but I couldn't discuss my medical status in necessary detail in Spanish. The doctor speaks to me in English.

Seoul. At dongtaemon (which is the place to shop in central Seoul), I see an American male telling an attendant at one of the shopping malls "I'll be back" in English. The attendant looks as if he understands.

Tokyo. At the TMG (Tokyo Metropolitan Government building) in the Shinjuku district, I see an indignant American lady asking a customer service employee why the shop only sells models of the North Tower and not the South. The lady speaks in English. The Japanese employee tries to speak in English.

Stuttgart. My German friend and I arrive at our other friend's house early. The front door is locked. It is raining. The neighbors come home and invite us to have a seat in their house until that friend's parents come back. I speak no German. The neighbors have no trouble switching to English.

Ho Chi Minh City. I go out with a friend who is bilingual in Cantonese and Vietnamese. I speak Cantonese and no Vietnamese. We stay at the house of one of his friends who speaks only Vietnamese. The friend tries to communicate with me in English.

I am quite annoyed when Americans tour the world expecting to be understood when they speak in English (granted, not every American is as such, but you have to admit Americans, especially teenagers and twenty-somethings, don't have a great reputation abroad). I am probably even more irritated when I see or hear non-native speakers of English from outside of the greater English-speaking world going to a foreign country where English is not the official language and trying to get around by speaking English.

Why English Is (But Shouldn't Be) the International Language

Credit: Savvy traveller

Takeaways
  • English shouldn't be the international language. No language should be.
  • The world needs more cultural exchange and less (American) cultural imperialism.
  • American college students should study abroad more often, particularly in non-traditional countries.
Did You Know?
About 350 million people speak English as their first language. As many as 1 billion speak it as a second.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 7 of 7
 
 
I can see both sides of the issue, but I am definitively in favor of keeping linguistic traditions alive. There really is no substitute to the cultural and linguistic expression inherent in the native language of a country. I am fluent in a couple languages, and there is an obvious difference in expression in different languages. Some things just don't translate. Oh, and English really is one of the most difficult languages to learn. It is my personal belief that there are more exceptions to rules than things that actually conform to it. And people who grew up speaking Bulgarian, Mandarin and Portuguese have told me English was a challenge.

Posted on 11/29/2006 at 8:11:00 PM

 
Why does one have to cancel out the other? Having a common language (English, for instance, since it's very accessible through worldwide media, as you pointed out) doesn't mean one has to "give up" one's own culture. I learned French, Spanish and Tagalog because those were the prevalent languages in the places I've lived; didn't make me forget my native English language or my cultural roots. Native Americans had a common sign language..how about that? Sign language for the Deaf is universal and easy to learn. Having a universal way to communicate is extremely important-remember the cautionary tale of Zog from the planet Margo. ;)

Posted on 11/28/2006 at 12:11:00 PM

 
Hm... I was just relaying information I had heard from a teacher of mine awhile ago. I think they said English was less advanced due to its alphaebet? I cant really remember, it was a long, long time ago. But like I said, compared to Chinese languages, English is much easier.

Posted on 11/28/2006 at 9:11:00 AM

 
Dude, English is one of the most technically mind-boggling and poorly constructed of the major languages. It's a hybrid of germanic and romance languages that is very clunky to learn as a second language, even a first. The only advantage it has over Russian and German is its relative brevity of word-length. It's perhaps easy to you because you learned it as a first language. Any language is easy when it's the only one you learn.

Posted on 11/28/2006 at 6:11:00 AM

 
Also, to add onto the other's comments, isn't English one of the easiest, if not the easiest language to learn? Why learn some other language like Chinese that is extremely advanced when you can learn easy English?

Posted on 11/27/2006 at 10:11:00 PM

 
Sorry Scott, but you are wrong. The countries that spoke english because of colonialism are dwarfed by the prevalence of the language now. And I too, as a frequent traveller, lament the widespread use of english. And have seen the attitude of some Americans abroad when they are not quickly understood in english. But there is hope, many cultures are striving to keep linguistic traditions alive.

Posted on 11/27/2006 at 8:11:00 PM

 
I think you're forgetting that English is widespread because of English colonialism. Most of the world already spoke English as a second language. US dominance or laziness had little to do with it.

Posted on 11/27/2006 at 8:11:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 7 of 7
 
Most Commented On