Find » Arts & Entertainment » The Monumental British Maternity Le...

The Monumental British Maternity Leave Policy

By Shanika, published Jul 16, 2008
Published Content: 207  Total Views: 235,459  Favorited By: 82 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.3 of 5
The British are at it again. Recently, they passed a law increasing their already monumental paid maternity leave from 9 months to 1 year. While many fertile British women are overjoyed, not everyone is pleased with the British law. Why? Well, because it's ridiculous.

I will be the first to admit that I happily used up the maternity leave afforded me after the birth of my daughter. Though I had only just entered the corporate world after separating from the Air Force, when my husband accidentally knocked me up I knew it was time to exit it. Pregnancy had shown me that what I wanted most was to be as close to a stay-at-home mom as we could afford. When my daughter was born, I took my 6 weeks of paid maternity leave, my 12 weeks of unpaid FMLA, then reluctantly returned to work on a part-time schedule. Less than 2 years later, I now work from home.

Trust me when I say that I believe in the importance of family. I believe that parents, not providers, should raise children. I believe in creative work schedules. I believe that daycare is an absolute last resort. I also believe in maxing out FMLA. At the same time, I don't believe that any employer should be hurt by an employee's decision to bear children. Apparently, British Parliament disagrees.

In America, we legally expect an employer to hold an employee's position for 12 unpaid weeks, sometimes longer, while they tend to their newborn. To a new mom, 12 weeks can fly by in a moment. Even with the additional 6 weeks of paid leave, I was still not ready to leave my daughter, even for a few hours a day. I can understand why employees might adopt a "the more, the merrier" attitude about maternity leave. However, those employees have probably never been employers.

The Monumental British Maternity Leave Policy

In Britain, you can have your cake and eat it too. Unless you're the employer - then you're screwed.

Credit: http://www.sxc.hu/profile/whirlybird

Copyright: http://www.sxc.hu/profile/whirlybird

Comments
Comments 1 - 11 of 11
 
 
Very interesting article. I absolutely agree with you. Parents choose to have babies, not entire workplaces, so why should everyone have to adjust their schedules based upon a private issue? If you can't afford to stay home, then don't, or wait to have children until you can. But don't expect everyone else to pick up your slack so you can have it all.

Posted on 08/05/2008 at 1:08:06 PM

 
How quickly people forget that in THIS country, prior to Bill Clinton we had no legally mandated maternity leave. NONE.

Posted on 07/29/2008 at 9:07:53 AM

 
You're always talking sense, Shanika! Although I don't have any offspring to worry about, and most likely am not going to in the near future, I enjoyed your review. Personally, I don't think people should be encouraged to have more children, and if a couple is going to have a child, maybe one of them should forfeit their career. Excellent article!

Posted on 07/28/2008 at 10:07:31 PM

 
I didn't realise that maternity leave had been increased at home. I can see where you are coming from. For British employees who do not have children, working around and in place of absent employees due to maternity leave can put an extra strain on others left behind. That is of course unless temps are hired until the end of the maternity leave. It's a tricky situation. In some ways there do seem to be more benefits for British families than American ones though. Sophie

Posted on 07/20/2008 at 1:07:43 PM

 
Well written article on a very provocative topic. This one deserves to be one of the most Commented On. I'm reminded of the Michael Moore fake-u-mentary on healthcare called Sicko in which he showed a scene of a new French mother getting a visit from a government worker who was there to do her laundry!! I'm with you and Carol on the balance thing... as one of those Greek philosopher said, "moderation in all things."

Posted on 07/18/2008 at 10:07:54 AM

 
Wow. Excelllent job. This is an unbelievable policy and you are right in your conclusions. It places the burden of a personal choice on the employer, which ultimately ends up costing consumers more.

Posted on 07/17/2008 at 10:07:07 PM

 
Excellent article Shankia and very well presented as always. It is more than understandable that an employee absent for a year will require re-training...granted..depending on the industry the training will be relative...In the States if one is in the emergency field and returns from extended leave re-training is mandatory. Imagine leaving a computer dominated field for a year? the return will def. have to include a training process. This British approach is in step with a socialized approach of governing, bigger government, increased entitlements...this approach has a poor track record. The current US political climate is dangerously close to embracing those Freedom hindering values.

Posted on 07/16/2008 at 11:07:41 PM

 
Shanika -- the consumate devil's advocate. :-) But yes, I think a balance is needed.

Posted on 07/16/2008 at 10:07:12 PM

 
Very good points made here! Your articles are always so thought provoking. :-)

Posted on 07/16/2008 at 9:07:08 PM

 
A very well thought presentation. I disagree with the statement that the parent-employee will need retraining upon returning to work- I suspect most would not. But I do agree that there has to be some sort of balance between paying benefits to support families and turning the employer into a welfare provider.

Posted on 07/16/2008 at 5:07:56 PM

 
Very good commentary. "the burden should lie on the parent, not the employer" ...whoop there it is! I'm all about being there for the kids and not letting a daycare or babysitter rear YOUR children, but when you decide to become a parent, the onus is on you, not your employer.

Posted on 07/16/2008 at 5:07:28 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 11 of 11
 
Advertisment