Open Letter to Pres. Bush

Immigration Will Be Your Legacy

By Guy Michaud, published Nov 17, 2006
Published Content: 12  Total Views: 1,969  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Rating: 2.0 of 5
It will soon be 7 years since you were first sworn in as the 43rd President of the United States. We all remember what was a painfully long delay for everyone to know who had been elected in the 2000 election. I was not sure of you, but I certainly had high hopes, what with your successful record as Governor of Texas. You had high ideals about the US government, and in particular, Washington D.C.

I must tell you first off, that I am not an American. I am a Canadian, possibly a rare one who supports President Reagan Conservatism and fundamental conservative values. I am a neighbor, an outsider looking in. I’m writing this in this format, and publishing it in this way, only because, a) no one would publish it in Canada and b) you most definitely would never see it. So I believe this is a more hopeful format. American or not, my wish is that you will welcome my recognition and my thoughts on what lies ahead. My preference would have been to wait until your term is done, and until your completed work can be evaluated from a historical perspective rather than from a sound-byte perspective. But with this latest election result, I decided to write you early.  May I point out that by writing this open letter to you today, sir, I am likely to lose a few more friends, and I may not hear from various family members for some time.

I have a few things in common with you, Mr. President. We apparently like the same music: John Fogerty and Stevie Ray Vaughn to name two. I particularly like Fogerty’s “Born on the Bayou” and SRV’s “Texas Flood”, and I wonder which are your favorites. I used to have a Scotch Terrier as well, appropriately named Scotty (my first wife is a Canadian of Scottish descent). Scotty past away earlier this year, after living 98 good dog years.

Open Letter to Pres. Bush

A President�s duty to protect his countrymen lay not only in wars in foreign lands, but in protecting them in the world�s sanctuary of hope; within American defended and enforced borders.

Credit: www.firstgov.gov

Copyright: www.firstgov.gov

Takeaways
  • Immigration is the issue post-9/11
  • Political chameleons undermine the electorate
  • Iran action and border protection in last Bush two years
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 12 of 12
 
 
But back to Iran for a second - Do you honestly believe that Iran would try to nuke Israel? Doing so would mean risking total annihilation for Iran and WWIII. You do realize that Israel is backed by America's 15,000+ nukes as well, and most of Europe would not stand for this? The sort of logic you are engaging is the stuff of fantasy, and above all its childish.

Posted on 11/18/2006 at 10:11:00 PM

 
and if you remember, the vast majority of Dems in Congress accepted Bush upon his election, and after 9/11 rallied behind him. They began to oppose him more vigorously only after he made his move on Iraq and began to dismantle the Constitution. Even many Republicans feel this way, although some remain quiet for political purposes.

Posted on 11/18/2006 at 10:11:00 PM

 
Guy, Israel has hundreds, maybe thousands of nukes, compared to Iran's zero.

Posted on 11/18/2006 at 10:11:00 PM

 
(I got cut off) I gave you three stars. I agree with your points but I think your writing had a few areas which needed a little improvement. You have a few unnecessary redundancies, and sometimes the prose fell lost on me; maybe it's the Canadian vs. American English. Of course, I'm far from perfect. But I believe in open and respectful criticism for the benefit of the writer.

Posted on 11/18/2006 at 11:11:00 AM

 
Guy. You're certainly aren't lacking gonads to publish this, as a Canadian. And to do so on a website that has no deficiency of people who not only disagree but would happily condemn you and perhaps have you silenced in a blink, also a gutsy move. I enjoy stirring the muck from time to time. Admittedly, I'm located somewhere between libertarian and conservative. Here in the States, that means my best of all choices is to vote (and write) Republican, which I most often do. GWB is a very smart man although many will vehemently disagree with that. He's also got an incredibly strong spine. His weakness is his salesmanship; he doesn't have any. People critique the man by mimicking his communication style, which admittedly his public speaking is an abomination. He thinks well, he acts well, he just can't sell his line and for that history will probably not be too kind to him. I gave you three stars. I agree with your points but I think your writing had a few areas which needed

Posted on 11/18/2006 at 11:11:00 AM

 
Guy. You're certainly aren't lacking gonads to publish this, as a Canadian. And to do so on a website that has no deficiency of people who not only disagree but would happily condemn you and perhaps have you silenced in a blink, also a gutsy move. I enjoy stirring the muck from time to time. Admittedly, I'm located somewhere between libertarian and conservative. Here in the States, that means my best of all choices is to vote (and write) Republican, which I most often do. GWB is a very smart man although many will vehemently disagree with that. He's also got an incredibly strong spine. His weakness is his salesmanship; he doesn't have any. People critique the man by mimicking his communication style, which admittedly his public speaking is an abomination. He thinks well, he acts well, he just can't sell his line and for that history will probably not be too kind to him. I gave you three stars. I agree with your points but I think your writing had a few areas which needed

Posted on 11/18/2006 at 11:11:00 AM

 
Hitler engineered the mass-murder of Jews, killing millions, but not before saying he would do so. How you can miss this one is beyond me. If you think a ground army large enough to conquer Europe is required, when several nukes would do then I suggest you try to connect the dots: Iran's President says "the Jews will perish very soon" and "No one will stop Iran from obtaining Nuclear technology". The legitimate concerns the Dems and the left had was to claim Bush illegitimate and that Bush had no mandate to govern; according to leftist logic, the recent slim victory of Dems means they have no mandate to govern either. I know my history paul, and I know enough to comment, whether you agree with my opinions or not.

Posted on 11/18/2006 at 9:11:00 AM

 
Paul, I know that you know what publishing means. Maybe what you don't understand is that Canada is very left-leaning, practically entirely socialist. All Canadian media (read: all) are liberal, including those who profess are conservative, while printing nothing but leftist propaganda. A pro-Bush letter would fly like a lead balloon. Should I draw you a picture?

Posted on 11/18/2006 at 8:11:00 AM

 
Well paul, Lieberman was the only Democrat that did not flop on the War in Iraq - for that, he was thrown overboard by his own party (was he not?); he defeated Lamont who held the party line as the anti-Iraq War candidate (did he not?)

Posted on 11/18/2006 at 8:11:00 AM

 
You also don't understand Connecticut politics so you should probably do some research before writing glib suggestions about Lieberman's victory.

Posted on 11/17/2006 at 9:11:00 PM

 
Also, you say this letter would not be published in Canada, huh? I'm not even surewhat that means - published where? In any case, maybe if you try to publish this as comedy somewhere in Canada, you might have better luck...

Posted on 11/17/2006 at 9:11:00 PM

 
To equate Ahmadinejad with Hitler is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. Hitler's military machine was poised to decimate Europe? Ahmadinejad's Iran is not even the most powerful nation in its region by a long shot? And the real power in Iran lies with the mullahs anyway - Do you realize these things? Do you also realize that you accuse the Dems of not granting Bush bipartisanship when their legitimate concerns have been ignored asa the minority in both the House and Senate? I suggest you learn some history and how the American government functions.

Posted on 11/17/2006 at 9:11:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 12 of 12
 
Most Commented On