Find » Sports » Barry Bonds: Worthy of the Hall

Barry Bonds: Worthy of the Hall

Steroids or Not, Barry Bonds Deserves to Be in the Hall of Fame

By Eric Carlstrom, published Nov 26, 2006
Published Content: 2  Total Views: 1,826  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.4 of 5
Barry Bonds established himself well before the 1998 season, which was when the steroids become known, according to the recent book, "Game of Shadows." The book states that Barry Bonds began using performance-enhancing drugs, including many different types of steroids and growth hormones, after the 1998 season; the same season Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa thrilled the world with their ongoing home run drama.

But Barry Bonds is different than Mark McGwire, and different than Sammy Sosa. Mark McGwire hit 238 home runs between his rookie year of 1986 and the 1994 season. Sammy Sosa hit 207 home runs in the same amount of time. But Barry Bonds? 334 home runs, far more than both McGwire and Sosa. Barry Bonds' scenario looked similar to this: As an extremely insecure person, Bonds saw McGwire and Sosa going crazy at the plate and couldn't take it. Why? Because he knew he was simply better than both of them, and they were taking credit as the major league's top hitters, an honor Bonds knew he deserved.

In no way am I defending Barry Bonds for using performance-enhancing drugs. I'm one who doesn't feel his single season home run record should count. And when he eventually passes Hank Aaron's all time record of 755 homeruns, I believe that lacks credibility. But to say that Barry Bonds is not a hall of famer, and Bonds as a baseball player lacks credibility, is where I feel he's being unfairly judged.

Barry Bonds: Worthy of the Hall

According to the book, "Game of Shadows" which was released in 2006, Barry Bonds interest in steroids grew after watching Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa's ongoing home run competition during the 1998 season.

Credit: unknown

Copyright: unknown

Takeaways
  • Barry Bonds was worthy of a hall of fame induction well before steroids were of concern.
  • Barry Bonds' numbers before 1999 were clearly better than many current hall of fame players.
  • Barry Bonds has recieved unfair treatment from the media, as if he's alone in using steroids.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 12 of 12
 
 
Loved the article! I think it made a valid point and included a lot of support that make it difficult to debate against

Posted on 06/26/2007 at 2:06:00 AM

 
This is the best article that I have read on Bonds and "the Hall." You make your points based on sound research and analysis. Your argument is clear, insightful, and convincing. You have a future in sports journalism. Keep up the good work.

Posted on 12/01/2006 at 9:12:00 PM

 
Great Job! It was a good read and filled with facts and details that I had not known before. I totally agree with you on the fact about Shawn Merriman and think that that's the media. All of this stuff about Barry Bonds is the media and they generate it all. Why do you think little kids want to grow up like Kobe who drops a lot of points, rather than Lebron James cuz hes a team player. Its all about what is presented to us. Great article though, I enjoyed. Keep it up and let me know when your next one goes up. PEACE

Posted on 12/01/2006 at 3:12:00 PM

 
I enjoyed reading your article dude, keep it up!

Posted on 11/29/2006 at 8:11:00 AM

 
Right on the money. Second to Willie Mays, Barry Bonds is the greatest player in the history of the game. Denying him the Hall would be abslurd. He was a Hall of Famer before the scandal, and in the USA one is innocent until proven guilty. You can't strip Hall privileges until Bonds definitely fails a drug test (appearances and books quoting jealous ex-girlfriends are not suitable grounds to prove guilt in this country). Even then, you can't do so, because A) steroids weren't illegalized until recently and B) Bonds would have been in anyway by just retiring after 1998. No question here.

Posted on 11/29/2006 at 3:11:00 AM

 
i do believe bonds was a good player and if he hadnt used steroids would have continued a hall of fame career. steroids dont teach you to hit a ball, but it does hlep hit farther so theres no doubt bonds was good but still he was on alot of stuff to enhance his play and physically you could tell. it also helped him when his body was past his prime when his body couldve started breaking down

Posted on 11/29/2006 at 12:11:00 AM

 
good article, dont hate the player hate the game.

Posted on 11/29/2006 at 12:11:00 AM

 
Honestly I think Bonds is a good player overall, but I don't think he deserves it! I think that he cheated, and i know other players are on steroids as well, but are those other players seting a new homerun record? I didn't think so.

Posted on 11/28/2006 at 10:11:00 PM

 
Bond's name will hang in the Hall Of Fame some day and his number will be retired by the San Fran Giants no questions asked. I totally agree. I did the points made about the fact that his numbers were far superior to the greats that are in the Hall Of Fame before his alleged steroid use started. Keep it up Bro Sports Illustrated here you come. Maybe you can write about me some day we will have to see.

Posted on 11/28/2006 at 9:11:00 PM

 
See, you don't have to do steroids to write a good article. The pen is truly mightier...

Posted on 11/28/2006 at 11:11:00 AM

 
Great article!

Posted on 11/27/2006 at 6:11:00 PM

 
your right bonds should be able to enter the hall of fame no questions asked, JUST CAUSE HE IS THE BEST AT WHAT HE DOES EVERYONE HATES. GREAT ARTICLE I ENJOYED READING YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS KEEP ON KEEPING ON

Posted on 11/26/2006 at 5:11:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 12 of 12
 
Most Commented On