Find » Society » Religion & Spirituality » Exposing the Unfair Truth About the...

Exposing the Unfair Truth About the James Randi $1,000,000 Psychic Challenge

The $1,000,000 Psychic Challenge May Put You at Risk

By Psychic, published Nov 27, 2006
Published Content: 255  Total Views: 256,454  Favorited By: 18 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.3 of 5
James Randi and the JREF (James Randi Educational Foundationg) is offering $1,000,000 to anyone who can demonstrate their psychic ability under a controlled challenge.  May we add that he has a long Application for Status of Claimant on his website at: http://www.randi.org/research/challenge.html .  If you read line 7of this application form, he clearly states that "When entering into this challenge, the applicant surrenders any and all rights to legal action against Mr. Randi, against any persons peripherally involved, and against the James Randi Educational Foundation, as far as this may be done by established statutes. This applies to injury, accident, or any other damage of a physical or emotional nature, and/or financial or professional loss, or damage of any kind. However, this rule in no way affects the awarding of the prize."  By reading this, you are agreeing that if you get hurt or injured in any way, shape or form, then you cannot sue or hold James Randi or the JREF liable.  I would not want to put my life on the line for any amount of money.  

I also found that Jame Randi's statement at the end of the form was rather harsh.  It states, "Please be advised that several applicants have suffered great personal embarrassment after failing these tests. I strongly advise you to conduct proper double-blind tests of any ability you believe you can demonstrate, before attempting to undergo a testing for this prize. This has saved many applicants much time and work, by showing that the powers were quite imaginary on the part of the would-be claimant. Please do this, and do not choose to ignore the need for such a precaution. This advice is offered only so that the applicant might be spared these problems.
- James Randi"

Takeaways
  • The $1,000,000 challenge has many rules attached to it that you may not be aware of.
  • You cannot sue James Randi or the JREF once you sign the contract for any reason whatsoever.
  • The foundation may embarrass you if you fail their challenge.
Did You Know?
Most celebrity psychics have not taken this test yet. Perhaps it has something to do with the rules and the pressure that this challenge can give to you.
Resources
  • Psychic
Comments
Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
 
I agree Rob, the sue clause exists in all contracts. There's no way someone could get injured by thinking real hard. It's there due to the large amounts of nutjobs on the planet. As far as the other complaints go(definition of obnoxious behavior, no legal recourse) they're all just excuses. If a general no sue clause is not in there, that means that anyone could get the money even if they clearly failed the test. All they'd have to do is tell the judge, they FEEL they passed and it's alright. In actuality, I'm only defending Randi's rights to do what he wants. I personally, don't think that he should be offering a challenge while soliciting donations at the same time. Plus, there are other challenges out there that are better than his. www.thefinalchallenge.com has a psychic challenge that offers twice the money and a book deal. There's no weird preliminary screening and the escrow issue has been addressed. I doubt miss brown would take a shot at that one either.

Posted on 04/26/2007 at 9:04:00 AM

 
The writer said that she would be afraid to do the test for fear of been kicked out for any reason. why would she be afraid if she is kicked out she hasn't lost anything she wouldn't be any worse off if that happened? but surely its worth it for the chance to win $1,000,000 if were offered a free lottery ticket with conceriably better odds than normal would you refuse out of fear you might not win?

Posted on 04/23/2007 at 9:04:00 AM

 
exemption to sue is a pritty standard clause in a contract these days the clause here doesn't seem unreasonable at all. Also contry to what the artical is trying to imply this wouldn't give the foundation a free pass to do whatever the hell they want to you. they could still be procicuted for murder or criminal negligance for example. it just insulates them from civel law suites from the applicants, a wise precauction given the tendency to sue for pritty much anything these days, its a long way from takeing your life in your hands. to me it sounds like the auther of the artical is trying to justify why they are unwilling to take the test to determin if they actualy have phycic powers. when in reality its most likely because they know they would fail the tests.

Posted on 04/23/2007 at 9:04:00 AM

 
The only thing is, with respect to Sylvia Browne (and I have an article pending about her) is that the only reason she has said publicly that she won't take his challenge is because he doesn't really have the money. He offered to put the money into an escrow account with King holding the account, and she never responded. If it's really about the contract, why doesn't she just say that?

Posted on 12/17/2006 at 7:12:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
Advertisment