Court Nixes Fine for the Janet Jackson Wardrobe Malfunction
A federal appeals court in Philadelphia overturned a $550,000 fine against CBS Corp. for the Janet Jackson Wardrobe Malfunction. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) had imposed a fine on CBS
network for a 2004 incident with Janet Jackson during the Super Bowl. During halftime, Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake performed Timberlake's Rock Your Body. Towards the end of the number, Justin Timberlake sang that he would "have you naked by the end of the song." Then he tore off part of Janet Jackson's black leather bustier and exposed part of her bare breast. CBS, MTV, and Timberlake have apologized, calling the incident a wardrobe malfunction. The court ruled that the FCC's actions had been "arbitrary and capricious."
Court Nixes Fine for the Janet Jackson Wardrobe Malfunction: Two Sides to the Janet Jackson Story
Conservative social groups sided with the FCC, arguing that Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunction had been indecent and that CBS network had behaved irresponsibly by allowing it to air. Viewers were concerned that Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunction had aired prime time and that there were children watching.
Yet those who support the Philadelphia court ruling could argue that CBS had no control over Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunction. The incident had been unrehearsed, and the network had no time to perform damage control. Although the network employs a five-second delay to prevent profanity, there had been no such measures to prevent this visual wardrobe malfunction.
I see both sides to the wardrobe malfunction incident. On the one hand, I agree with the Philadelphia court ruling. CBS should not be punished for an incident that was beyond its control. However, CBS should use this as a lesson to prevent future wardrobe malfunctions from airing on TV.
Court Nixes Fine for the Janet Jackson Wardrobe Malfunction: Other Janet Jackson Moments
Court Nixes Fine for the Janet Jackson Wardrobe Malfunction
Court Nixes Fine for the Janet Jackson Wardrobe Malfunction: Two Sides to the Janet Jackson Story
Conservative social groups sided with the FCC, arguing that Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunction had been indecent and that CBS network had behaved irresponsibly by allowing it to air. Viewers were concerned that Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunction had aired prime time and that there were children watching.
Yet those who support the Philadelphia court ruling could argue that CBS had no control over Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunction. The incident had been unrehearsed, and the network had no time to perform damage control. Although the network employs a five-second delay to prevent profanity, there had been no such measures to prevent this visual wardrobe malfunction.
I see both sides to the wardrobe malfunction incident. On the one hand, I agree with the Philadelphia court ruling. CBS should not be punished for an incident that was beyond its control. However, CBS should use this as a lesson to prevent future wardrobe malfunctions from airing on TV.
Court Nixes Fine for the Janet Jackson Wardrobe Malfunction: Other Janet Jackson Moments
Most Comments Today
- Cyber Attack Aftermath: Perplexed AC Exec Asks, "Why Us?" It's easy to guess why cyber attackers went after the White House and the Pen... 30 Comments
- Easy Napkin Folding Techniques Find easy napkin folding techniques that anyone can do. Butterfly fold, Bis... 26 Comments
- Frogg Toggs Chilly Pad: Product Review Use the Frogg Toggs Chilly Pad to stay cool this summer. Designed to keep yo... 26 Comments
- Hot News Quickies - Wednesday, July 8, 2009 News happens while you sleep - get your Hot News Quickies here! 23 Comments
- This is Not Love Many women all around the world are in an unhealthy relationship. In this sh... 22 Comments
- False Friends Between English and French English and French share a fair number of lexical false friends, i.e. words t... 21 Comments





Sheri Fresonke Harper
Posted on 08/26/2008 at 9:08:39 AM
R. Elizabeth C. Kitchen
Posted on 07/29/2008 at 3:07:54 PM
Demetria Dixon
Posted on 07/28/2008 at 12:07:28 PM
PenPress
Posted on 07/25/2008 at 11:07:32 AM
Linda M. McCloud
Posted on 07/24/2008 at 2:07:55 PM
Kay Whittenhauer
Posted on 07/22/2008 at 4:07:49 PM
M. Kaye Hash
Posted on 07/22/2008 at 12:07:00 PM
Joshua McMorrow-Hernandez
Posted on 07/22/2008 at 8:07:36 AM
Carly Hart
Posted on 07/22/2008 at 8:07:29 AM
Bandit
Posted on 07/22/2008 at 8:07:37 AM