OJ, GOP Activists, Foley, Haggard and Rush - Much in Common

Chutzpah - Fate Has a Sense of Humor and Irony

By Jim Stillman, published Nov 28, 2006
Published Content: 160  Total Views: 86,419  Favorited By: 46 CPs
Rating: 4.3 of 5
The classic definition of chutzpah is generally given as, a boy is on trial for murdering his parents, and he begs for leniency, because he is an orphan. The term has many English close-synonyms, but none quite capture the flavor of the Yiddish. Some terms that come close are gall, arrogance or hubris, the latter term itself defined as overconfident pride and arrogance.

There have recently been a spate of instances which illustrate the essence of chutzpah.

OJ’s new book, I didn’t kill them, but if I had . . .

On June 12, 1994, O.J. Simpson’s former wife Nicole Brown and her friend Ronald Goldman were found dead outside Brown's condominium. Simpson was soon charged with their murders. The arrest and trial were among the most widely publicized in American history. On October 3, 1995, Simpson was found not guilty of the two murders. Notwithstanding the jury’s verdict, only four people in the entire country felt Mr. Simpson had not killed them.

Three years later, in a civil suit for wrongful death, the Brown and Goldman families won a verdict against Simpson for $33.5 million. Since the standard of proof for a criminal verdict is “beyond all reasonable doubt” and that of a civil trial, “a preponderance of the evidence”, the judicial determination is that he is between 51% and 99% guilty!

Now, in 2006, after, according to Simpson, searching for the “real” murderer (on golf courses throughout Florida), Simpson has written a book and is the subject of a Fox special (“fair and balanced”) in which he outlines how he would have murdered Brown and Goldman, were he the one responsible for the killings. Simpson is said to be making $3.5 million for this exploitation, par for the course for a man who did the same to many of his trusted friends, who after learning all of the facts under oath said clear and convincingly—he did it.

GOP operatives assert that Bill Clinton’s presidency was marred by his preoccupation with sex and scandal.

Takeaways
  • OJ is but the latest example of chutzpah.
  • GOP accusing Clinton of distractions is pure nerve .
  • Maybe fate has a sense of humor after all
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
No one -- and certainly not I -- are supportive of drug use. My point is that one who uses drugs illegally should not damn others who do the same. Just as one who is homosexual should lead a parade to condemn gays.

Posted on 12/02/2006 at 1:12:00 PM

 
“There's nothing good about drug use. We know it. It destroys individuals. It destroys families. Drug use destroys societies. Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and neighborhoods, which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up. “What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug use. Too many whites are getting away with drug sales. Too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too.”

Posted on 12/02/2006 at 12:12:00 PM

 
Is it chutzpah, or just appealing to their mind numb base...the base that doesn't care what their leaders actually do, as long as they tell them it's ok to hate gays and liberals...

Posted on 11/30/2006 at 10:11:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Most Commented On