DHS Debunks Monster of Montauk Mystery

Plum Island Director's Statement

The Director of the Plum Island Animal Disease Center today uttered an unequivocal denial that the Monster of Montauk came from the facility.

With the Monster of Montauk the hottest topic on Google Trends for the second day running, Associated Content called the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) which jointly operate the facility,
DHS Debunks Monster of Montauk Mystery
 for a response to persistent speculation that the Montauk Monster is USDA property. As reported yesterday on Associated Content, the USDA's Plum Island Animal Disease Center is located not far from where the Montauk Monster washed ashore.

The close proximity of the Plum Island facility and the site of the Montauk Monster's discovery had fueled speculation that the Monster of Montauk is property of the USDA and may have been an experiment gone wrong or a byproduct of improper disposal.

Dr. Larry Barrett, Plum Island Animal Disease Center (PIADC) Director, responded to a flood of media inquiries on the Montauk Monster by issuing the following statement:

"It is impossible to accurately identify the species of animal from the photo. There is no scale from which to judge its size. Additionally, when a body has had prolonged exposure to water and predators, it can be altered or appear different from its normal form. If we had the actual body, we could tell you what it is; however, from viewing a canine tooth in the picture, we could guess it may be a cat or raccoon. I can state categorically that it is not associated with the work performed at Plum Island Animal Disease Center (PIADC). PIADC serves as the nation's first line of defense against foreign animal diseases of livestock by identifying such diseases through diagnostic testing and by developing vaccines to protect livestock from those diseases."

Related information
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 39 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Response to:are all of you people idiots?!?!? how does that thing look anything like a raccoon? or a dog or cat? whatever that animal is its not normal... and it could just be a deformed animal. but from where? and why hasnt anyone taken the so called "remains" of the creature to a lab?!? instead they have some idiot guy let it rot in his backyard. its pretty wierd how this SHOULD be identified and yet no one has taken any action to do that. All we get is speculation as to what animal it could be.Oh and lets not forget that Jeff Corwin is also agreeing that our little monster is a raccoon. Jeff Corwin.... Are you kidding me!?!!? Somethings not right about this whole thing. I dont want to believe its a fake, but not one scientest or ANYONE for that matter has tried to figure out once and for all wtf it really is I tottaly agree it dosent look anything like a dog or a cat even a rccon it's suspicious how they let some random guy keep it in his backyard. and to anyone who agr

Posted on 05/15/2009 at 12:05:47 AM

since the end of my last comment was cut off i'm back to continue. As I was saying, what are you going to do when they put out another disease out there (like they did w/HIV)? You going to stay stupid and think "where did that come from". Like I said, "get real".

Posted on 03/11/2009 at 11:03:17 PM

Surrounded is the only normal person who wrote a normal comment. For crying out loud you people, what's your problem that you're in denile. Of course the monster isn't anything we've ever seen or know of. I agree w/why hasn't someone, espically the couple who FIRST came upon it, took pictures (w/flies on it too) & was dumb enough to even admit they walked away. What in the world is wrong w/them that they kept their mouth shut and waited for someone else to see it and speak up? Did they think the gov't was going to slit their throat for exercising their rights to freedom of speech? What a couple of weenies. Get real. Since people think the monster came from the the gov't homeland security bldg 18miles away why not say something right away instead of later? Dr. Barrett from the gov't bldg says "it looks like a dog, a racoon" He may convience you idots but not me. C'mon u dopes, they made that thing. so, they don't need to figure it out. Daahh! What are you going to do when they put anoth

Posted on 03/11/2009 at 11:03:08 PM

great article, I read the novel by that name, it was cool :) Sheri

Posted on 12/04/2008 at 1:12:23 AM

are all of you people idiots?!?!? how does that thing look anything like a raccoon? or a dog or cat? whatever that animal is its not normal... and it could just be a deformed animal. but from where? and why hasnt anyone taken the so called "remains" of the creature to a lab?!? instead they have some idiot guy let it rot in his backyard. its pretty wierd how this SHOULD be identified and yet no one has taken any action to do that. All we get is speculation as to what animal it could be.Oh and lets not forget that Jeff Corwin is also agreeing that our little monster is a raccoon. Jeff Corwin.... Are you kidding me!?!!? Somethings not right about this whole thing. I dont want to believe its a fake, but not one scientest or ANYONE for that matter has tried to figure out once and for all wtf it really is.

Posted on 08/09/2008 at 8:08:20 PM

Fantastic job~!

Posted on 08/06/2008 at 1:08:15 PM

Excellent job on this. I'm leaning toward raccoon. :-)

Posted on 08/06/2008 at 9:08:17 AM

Don't k now what it is but it kind of looks like a deformed dog.

Posted on 08/05/2008 at 8:08:15 PM

Great follow-up. Thanks, Carol!

Posted on 08/03/2008 at 11:08:32 PM

Hmm, your headline suggests that the Dept. of Homeland Security is saying that something does not exist. Would that not then mean that, in fact, it is proper for us to realize that there is no question it does exist? I have learned over the years that the best way to interpret the words of George W. Bush or anyone he has appointed is to listen to what they say and then believed the exact opposite. Try it, it works every time. So, in my estimation, this monster must exist. The logic is irrefutable. It literally cannot be refuted.

Posted on 08/03/2008 at 6:08:20 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 39 Next >>