Steven Soderbergh's Che Can't Get a Distribution Deal

Does that Mean Hollywood Isn't Run by Communist America-Hating Liberals?

The lack of a distribution deal for the two part, four hour films known collectively as Che seems really bizarre when you consider that Hollywood and the movie industry and American media have all been attacked as hotbeds of liberalism intent on destroying the capitalist way of life that has done such a wonderful job of bringing equality to all Americans. Despite the fact that the Republican Party remains the only political party in American to have ever elected actors to two Governorships and a Presidency, conservatives continue to attack the entertainment industry in ways that even today make the Communist Witch Hunt of the 1940s and 1950s look downright awkward. In other words, what I'm trying to say is that if American's entertainment industry really was dedicated to destroying this wonderful economic system responsible for $4.00 a gallon gasoline and a recession for everybody in the country except for oil companies who have been reporting record profits for the last five years, then why would it be so hard to find a distributor for a movie about one of the most famous socialists in the world directed by an Academy Award-winning director and starring an Academy Award-winning actor?

Steven Soderbergh directed Benicio del Toro to a Best Actor award at the Cannes Film Festival, yet a distribution deal cannot be got for this film even when distribution deals have been gotten for such films as Happily N'Ever After, Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End, and Meatballs III. Hard to figure out why such a flaming poop bag of outmoded liberal thinking would find be so willing to distribute these movies that extol far right conservative ideals (and rank among the worst movies of all time) but would reject a film about the second most famous communist the Americas has ever produced.