Montauk Monster Pictures Show Raccoon, Dog, Turtle... What?

Exactly What is the Monster of Montauk?

No one seems to be disputing that some strange creature washed ashore on Montauk in early July. But not many agree on what it might be. Since the pictures surfaced on Tuesday, July 29, and were disseminated worldwide via Gawker.com and other outlets, the Montauk Monster has undergone
Montauk Monster Pictures Show Raccoon, Dog, Turtle... What?
Date: July 29, 2008
East Hampton, NY
United States of America
 intense scrutiny and even more intense speculation as to what it might actually be. Jeff Corwin, wildlife expert on Animal Planet, told Fox News that the Montauk Monster was actually an "incredibly rare raccoon." Fox News also reported that a member of animal control at East Hampton Department of Environmental Analysis told New York magazine that it was a raccoon.

Is The Montauk Monster A Raccoon?

There are now several sets of witnesses claiming to have seen the Montauk Monster aside from Alanna Nevitski, who took the original photo. Three young ladies appeared on New York local channel Plum TV and shared a second picture of the 'Monster' with the world. Rachel Goldberg, Jenna Hewitt, and Courtney Fruin were a bit evasive when talking about the creature, but did say that the Montauk Monster had originally been brought ashore by a surfer friend of theirs who had not wanted to run into its floating body while surfing. The surfer himself then appeared -- with a bag of what appeared to be bones -- on television, stating that he was going to have them studied by a scientist.

To add spice to the story, Alanna Nevitski is saying in interviews that the three girls and the surfer are full of what creatures are generally full of and that they had nothing to do with the picture. It has also been suggested that the trio of discoverers photoshopped the picture they presented. They of course deny any tampering with the photo.

So... Is The Montauk Monster A Raccoon?

Related information
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 25 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

well; from all the comments on people that changed their mind - that must mean that it would be foolish to think their original thoughts - so they must be right if the words indicated that they changed their mind.

Posted on 05/15/2009 at 9:05:48 PM

I am truly sorry, Casey. I was born a skeptic, apparently. I believe not and look for proof... although I do allow for the possibility that these things might exist...

Posted on 08/19/2008 at 8:08:38 PM

I choose to believe, kinda like not guilty until........ like the bigfoot story, and yes i did believe that one too.

Posted on 08/19/2008 at 3:08:38 PM

The Montauk creature is nothing but the bloated carcass of a racoon with the hair and muzzle eroded off. The real story of the century is the discovery of a deceased Bigfoot, or Sasquatch found in Georgia. Check out David Claerr's articles on AC.

Posted on 08/12/2008 at 7:08:44 AM

Now you know where all those stories of kraken and sea monsters come from, Princess q -- decomposition and vivid imaginations...

Posted on 08/09/2008 at 5:08:57 AM

You're probably right. It reminds me of that story about that thing some fishermen pulled out of the water, and everyone thought it was some kind of sea monster. It turned out to be a badly decomposed whale.

Posted on 08/09/2008 at 12:08:15 AM

That beak, Princess q, is most likely a result of wave and sand erosion. Creepy it might be, but totally explainable it seems to be as well...

Posted on 08/08/2008 at 8:08:07 AM

That thing was creepy. I definately have no idea what it might be. The body looks like a dog, but there was a beak looking thing on it's face. If it's a fake, it's a really good one.

Posted on 08/08/2008 at 12:08:49 AM

hey it is a ugly hairy turtle,bird,crab, and somethin? you tell me

Posted on 08/07/2008 at 8:08:53 PM

Would everyone please stop saying its a turtle without its shell ! first off imposible their spine is connected to their shell and secondly come on people has anyone seen a turtle or tortoise with teeth before ?

Posted on 08/07/2008 at 3:08:25 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 25 Next >>