Typo Eradication Advancement League Stamped Out?

Radical Grammarian Duo Went Too Far but Have a Marketable Plan

Search for the online presence of the Typo Eradication Advancement League (TEAL) at JeffDeck.com/teal/ and you will find a relatively blank page that promises to offer up a statement on the signage of National Parks to come at a later time. Has
Typo Eradication Advancement League Stamped Out?
 the Typo Eradication Advancement League been stamped out?

WAVY-TV reported that the brains behind the operation -- Jeff Deck of Somerville, Massachusetts, and his cohort Benjamin Herson of Virginia Beach -- admitted to their conspiracy and complicity to deface a historic marker because it contained a typographical error. Restitution and probation were ordered, and in addition the dynamic duo of grammarians with a purpose is banned for one year from national parks.

A Google cache screenshot of the Typo Eradication Advancement League shows a slightly different face of the organization. A mix of a game and a grammarian on a mission, TEAL had issued a 2008 Typo Hunt across America. An apparently even more dynamic trio has plotted its course across the nation and highlighted areas where it plied its volunteer trade. Adding to the disdain the group has for typos of all kinds is the occasional comic it posts, this one pertaining to a spelling error on a tattoo.

I am reminded of the Mike Reed caricature depicting the grammarian warrior as the one person whose lack of contribution to any discussion is made up for by his outward obsession with pointing out the spelling and grammatical errors of others. He appears self righteous, self serving, and seems to look down his nose at the mistakes made by others. Does this describe the Typo Eradication Advancement League?

I would like to believe that it does not. Perhaps Jeff Deck and Benjamin Herson simply snapped at the signs of a growing grammatical incompetence paired with typographical ineptitude. Maybe they set out on a noble mission to help Americans reclaim their dignified linguistic heritage. Then at some juncture something went terribly wrong, and rather than fixing the errors of the masses, they decided to become graffiti hacks with a purpose; instead of contributing to America, they simply took away from it.

Related information
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 18 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

I think their mission is great! I have always loved the English language and it bugs me to see commas and apostrophes misplaced. Even worse to me is the current fad of trying to make irregular verbs into regular verbs, such as "digged" for the proper "dug" or "lighted" for "lit"!

Posted on 03/04/2009 at 11:03:03 AM

I loved T.E.A.L.'s mission; they were fed up with the country's overall language-laziness and decided to do something about it. True, they went too far here in altering a "historical landmark," but I think it's a bit odd that it would happen in the first place. (Throughout their tour across the country, they ALWAYS asked the permission of the signs' owners BEFORE correcting the errors.) It seems very uncharacteristic of them that they'd failed to do so in this instance, and whether they slipped, or they simply failed to acquire permission from the appropriate park authority, something just doesn't add up. Their entire message was, "Spot the error, ask first, correct accordingly." What happened here?

Posted on 10/06/2008 at 9:10:03 AM

Very funny post!!

Posted on 09/01/2008 at 7:09:56 AM

I read a local flashing light sign set out by the local police department yesterday. It read, "School's are open."

Posted on 08/28/2008 at 6:08:12 AM

I am glad those two individuals got fined and into trouble, they broke the law. It is plain and simple, a law is written to be absolute and if you want to get something corrected like a sign at a public park or national park, tell them. I am sure that something could have been done but to just go around and "fix" it is not the correct way to go about things. Vandalism: willful or malicious destruction or defacement of public or private property. To deface something refers to marking or removing the part of an object (especially images, be they on the page, in illustrative art or as a sculpture) designed to hold the viewers attention. You are actually defacing, vandalising, something if you are marking on it without the owners permission.

Posted on 08/27/2008 at 12:08:59 PM

With all this buzz about grammar, I better learn to write more better.

Posted on 08/24/2008 at 8:08:17 PM

Hey, the Liberty Bell WAS fixed more than once. Fixing it again is not a bad idea.

Posted on 08/24/2008 at 7:08:36 PM

Why not fix that big crack in the Liberty Bell? It's one thing to point out typos on signs, and another thing to alter (improve or disfigue) someone else's property, especially if it is an artifact appreciated for its historical value. Plus, I read a quote from one if his blogs, in reference to an error he didn't change: "I was reluctant to disfigure the sign any further. ... Still, I think I shall be haunted by that perversity, emense, in my train-whistle-blighted dreams tonight." He seems a little obsessive with his "mission," and more concerned with his poetic self-righteousness than making any real improvement in the grammatical state of America.

Posted on 08/24/2008 at 3:08:55 PM

I can't see why two men in love would even care about grammer

Posted on 08/23/2008 at 5:08:46 PM

I love it!! They need to be on the current presidential staff.

Posted on 08/23/2008 at 4:08:03 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 18 Next >>