Find » Society » People » Transubstantiate Pagan or Sacred?

Transubstantiate Pagan or Sacred?

Holy Communion: In Remembrance of Him

By Hannah Mecaskey, published Dec 11, 2006
Published Content: 8  Total Views: 2,379  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.0 of 5
The Christian church is founded solely upon the teachings of Jesus Christ. The church originally was composed of all Jewish members who accepted Jesus as their long-awaited Messiah and the Son of God. Most of the Jewish community, however, rejected the Gospel which was then embraced by the Gentiles. Through Christ's universal message of grace and redemption, God's church was opened to all believers, both Jew and Gentile. Scattered throughout the world, God's church existed as “a spiritual entity- one founded and directed by the Holy Ghost.1] United in the sacrifice of Christ, Christians remember Christ;s conquering of eternal death in the celebration of Holy Communion. At the Lord's Supper, Jesus first celebrated the sacrament of Communion, an “outward sign of inward grace instituted by Christ for our sanctification[2] to convey to His church the eternal accomplishments of His sacrifice.

The roots of Holy Communion trace back to the Jewish Passover Seder symbolism of the Passover lamb. The Passover Seder is a symbolic meal celebrating how God spared the Israelites from the Angel of Death in His final plague on Egypt. Through His servant Moses, God commanded the Israelites to sacrifice a spotless lamb and spread its blood on the doorposts of their homes. When the Angel of Death came to slaughter the firstborn in Egypt, he passed over the homes that were covered by the lamb's blood, inflicting death upon those homes, Jewish and Egyptian alike, that were not covered with the blood. Each year afterwards, the Hebrew people have continued celebrating the Passover Seder, remembering how God has preserved the nation of Israel. Wine is symbolically used in the Seder where, Four cups of wine are consumed at the meal indicating God's saving presence four times in Jewish history.[3] Both the unleavened bread and wine, along with the other symbolic elements of Passover, were given new meaning at Jesus' celebration of the Passover Seder in the Last Supper.

Transubstantiate Pagan or Sacred?

The bread and wine

Credit: Shepherd's Promise Church in Deerfield, FL

Copyright: http://www.kodachrome.org/shepherd/

Takeaways
  • The current Roman Catholic Church continues to believe that the sacrament of Holy Communion has transubstantiate significance rather than being a memorial celebration.
  • Transubstantiation, the central element of the Catholic Mass, was a main point of contention for the Protestants during the Protestant Reformation because of its pagan origin.
  • The Catholic Eucharist in which the bread and wine are transformed on the altar into the blood and body of Christ incorporated pagan Totem-system beliefs to ease pagan conversion.
Did You Know?
At the Lord's Supper, Jesus first celebrated the sacrament of Communion, an ;outward sign of inward grace instituted by Christ for our sanctification; to convey to His church the eternal accomplishments of His sacrifice.
Comments
Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
 
The early church, before the establishment of the Church of Rome, denied the occurrence of transubstantiation in the celebration of Holy Communion when pre-Constantine Roman officials accused Christians of being cannibals. ...The early Christians defended themselves against this transubstantiate belief by claiming their sacred celebration to be in memory of Christ's broken body, not a physical consumption of it. And where, my dear author, do you find support for this statement? I can tell you that this is absolutely not true, and we have accounts of people dying in defense of the Holy Eucharist all the way back loooong before the establishment of the Roman Church. Basic defense of this belief lies in John chapter 6. Read it. Jesus knows this is difficult when he tells us to literally 'gnaw' on his flesh. 3000 people left because of it. You are presenting your own conclusions drawn from other people's oppinions and not facts. If you are a Christian, you should know that i

Posted on 03/13/2008 at 6:03:27 PM

 
I'm not saying that what you are writing is meaningless babble. To me, it is perfectly clear, but everyone is not me.

Posted on 04/12/2007 at 8:04:00 AM

 
Hmmm. . . Richelle has a slight point, Hannah. . . making bold statements is good, but bold statements require concrete elements of factual information. Her example of the Christian church is a good one. I agree with your views, but only because I have taken the time to study them out for myself and choose by faith to believe them. To a person who is not a Christian however, you need to "speak as a man" as Paul put it. People who are carnal cannot hear spiritual things and understand completely without hearing some sort of explanation and defence, even for minor points like the "church" example. Keep up your writing, I love it, but if you want to make an impact upon unbelieving intellectuals, change your tactics.

Posted on 04/11/2007 at 11:04:00 AM

 
Hannah, it is because the atheist article was featured on the front page of AC. Everybody saw it, and started commenting on it. I won't even get into the subject of this or the other article, but I do want to comment that I believe a lot of the reasons your writing is attracting such negative comments is because you make a lot of bold statements that are not backed by logic, facts, or even common sense. It is easy to disagree with your arguments, based on your writing style alone. For example, your first sentence in this article, " The Christian church is founded solely upon the teachings of Jesus Christ." IS simply NOT true. I think I know what you mean, but the way you stated it is easy to prove wrong. "The Christian church" first of all, is a huge diverse entity to take on and of which speak of with authority. And to say that it is founded 100% soley on the teachings of Jesus is not correct. Your statements, and therefore your views take on a simplistic, uneducated air, that

Posted on 01/27/2007 at 10:01:00 AM

 
Surprised this one didn't get as flamed as the other. Wow. Lord have mercy. Why, this one discusses truth in absolutes just as much as the other! Is reasoning "better" or the writing?

Posted on 01/27/2007 at 10:01:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
Advertisment