Sort by: Most Relevant Publish Date

HUMAN CLONING  

The recent publicity around the Senate bill supporting stem cell research has once again fanned the flame on the smoldering debate of human cloning. This article provides thoughts on "one good reason" to support this research.

This article explores arguments both for and against human cloning based on the works of authors/scientists such as Leon Kass, Michael Shermer, and Arthur Zucker.

This debate paper was written for an interdisciplinary science course. It delves deeper into the ethical issues surrounding cloning.

Many people cannot stomach the idea of scientists manipulating the natural process of conception and birth. The true question is short, but far from simple-is cloning a necessary evil?

Introduces some of the basic ethical concerns surrounding reproductive cloning.

This article describes the views of each side of the cloning argument and also gives a personal opinion on the subject.

Two arenas that the stem cell research debate should not be decided in are politics and media. To b sure education, ethics, and science are the only places to have an intelligent conversation about who should play God and who should not!

There are many reasons to avoid human cloning and many reasons to consider it. The following is a brief overview.

This is a legal paper written in 2003 and explores the approaches of Canada and the United States to cloning regulation and stem cell research. The paper compares legislation between the two countries at that time and also suggests a model approach for these new fields.

When you think of human cloning, the first thing that comes to mind is the impossibility of the procedure. That is not the case.

This article explores the possibility of human cloning.

The initiative would write an amendment into the Missouri Constitution to prohibit the practice of human cloning.

A look at the truth behind human cloning

This article takes a look at how human cloning can be done. It also looks at both sides of the argument of is it good or bad? Is it helpful or hurtful? It offers up information so you can choose what you think of human cloning. This is an opinion.

This essay was written for an interdisciplinary biology course. It is a prelude to a debate paper discussing human cloning. This particular item serves as a good outline for the issue.

Thirty-one Democrats voted along with 182 Republicans against a bill to outlaw the cloning of human babies on Wednesday.

human cloning, what does it mean and will science push the envelope far enough to go there?

This essay explores some of the fallacious predictions made about the future of human cloning, as well as actual possibilities for it and ethical arguments in its favor.

G. Stolyarov II urges all rational men to take a stand in favor of scientific advancement through the support of developments such as cloning, genetic engineering, and stem cell research.

This paper examines the arguments and rationale for and against human reproductive cloning.

An overview cloning.

how therapeutic cloning is ok under Jewish law

Creating a being whether human or animal is creating a life, which someone must be responsible for.

The "stem cell research" debate in the media glosses over scientific reality. Real hope lies with adult stem cells, but that's not the technology California, Missouri and others want to spend your tax money on.

A look at the possibili6ty of cloing, and some pros and cons concerning this moral, ethical and scientifically unproven theory and procedure

Of all the terms coined by scientists which have entered popular vocabulary, 'clone' has become one of the more emotive. The question shakes us all to our very souls.

Although cloning in the real world is a recent development, the philosophies and principles being debated are not. A short opinion piece on the current discussion

what rabbinic sages say are the problems preventing cloning under Jewish law

Have you every wondered why cloning was such a hot topic in our society?

cloning

what Jewish law has to say regarding the ethics and morality of cloning

Artificial insemination, embryo transfer, cloning, transgenic, hybrid...so many terms are confusing to consumers and with misunderstanding comes fear.

All over the world, people are searching for ways to improve themselves and their lives. Cloning can help the lives of millions of people in the United States. It offers a variety of options that can help almost everyone.

How Jewish law reflects on teh history of cloning

Popular fears that cloning will lead to people making "copies of themselves," "clone armies," or clones bred for spare organs completely misconstrue what cloning is and what its results are. Mr. Stolyarov demolishes these widespread fallacies here.

Considering what the Bible says regarding the matter of cloning.

Cloning is wrong. Making species go extinct is wrong. I'd like to pit these two wrongs up against each other. Which wins out?

Human cloning is greatly hampered by a severe shortage of eggs. Each attempt often requires thousands of eggs, and because women only create eggs every 28 days, the supply line becomes a case of quality over quantity.

From one hair -- 15 new ones can be reproduced in about 12 days. The next step is transplanting those hairs one by one, and then allowing those hairs to grow at their normal rate.

The technology that enables scientists to tranfer an embryo from one animal into the uterus of one of a different species has opened up new possibilities for the preserving - and restoring - of endangered and even possibly extinct species.

Jurassic Park brought the idea of bringing extinct animals back to life to millions of novel readers and moviegoers. It has only been recently, however, that the idea has become plausible to scientists, and not with dinosaurs but woolly mammoths.

Voters in Missouri will comment on a national issue November 7 when they are asked to amend their state constitution to specifically allow and define the conditions for stem cell research.

The late actor Christopher Reeve was a tireless advocate of stem cell research in the last decade of his life. The results of a new study our of John's Hopkins Medical School may bring his dream closer to fruition

American voters, when choosing a political candidate, may have the impact to determine whether or not stem cell research is funded by the government in the next decade.

Conservatives argue that stem cell research is immoral. They argue that embryos are "killed" in the process. But, does stem cell research really "tale" a life? Or would restricting such research do more harm?

In the first ever veto issued by the President, after 5½ years in office, embryonic stem cell researchers and patients living with myriad diseases and debilitating conditions were disappointed in their quest for better federal funding for research.

This week, the American Diabetes Association strenuously urged the United States Senate to pass the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005, which would shift the government's involvement in the issue of stem cell research into high gear.

Ethical and moral reasons why stem cell research should be better funded.

Democrats are using a change in political climate in order to secure passage of an embryonic stem-cell research bill. President Bush is promising to veto the latest effort.

What is stem cell research? Why is the Roman Catholic Church opposing against a huge science research?